From: Gwenole B. <gb...@di...> - 2004-11-01 21:53:23
|
Hi, I revived and fixed the x86_64 port that started almost two years ago.=20= Performance may look lower than with the 32-bit binary because it's=20 currently lacking two key features that will yield an interesting speed=20= boost. For now, it's a way to check the runtime assembler is working=20 properly for a new PowerPC JIT. Talking about a verifier, I currently have a test code=20 (test_codegen_x86.cpp) that covers only 5.5 million variations and is=20 lacking some others. Someone may be interested in contributing a=20 rewrite that uses a derivative of GNU disassembler's internal=20 structures instead of string compares to check things. I simply=20 implemented that rapidly for other matters. ;-) My test machine for the port is based on Xeon EM64T but it should work=20= fine on AMD64 processors too. Relevant code is in CVS. Bye, Gwenol=E9.= |