From: Christian B. <cb...@st...> - 2001-06-28 15:21:27
|
Hi! On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 12:44:38AM +0200, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote: > That's nice, 0.9.1 is showing up ? ;-) Rather 1.0 :-) > - What are we supposed to return when we can't change resolution/depth > (memory re-allocation error, failure in DGA vidmode switching, etc.) ? You are supposed to crash. :-) The MacOS Display Manager was obviously designed for interfacing with video _hardware_ and it assumes that when a mode is supported, it can be switched to. Since no return value is being checked, there is no point in providing one. > - In direct addressing, we used to determine the base address of the Mac > framebuffer from the host address. Does your infrastructure permit > dynamic relocation of the Mac frame buffer ? Yes, this should work. Bye, Christian -- / Coding on PowerPC and proud of it \/ http://www.uni-mainz.de/~bauec002/ |