From: <gb...@di...> - 2001-01-05 22:51:46
|
Hi, > On Mon, Dec 04, 2000 at 07:55:38PM +0100, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote: > > Talking about PPC Emulation, I realized when I finally set up a PPC > > cross-compilation system that PSIM was only twice as slow as UAE on the > > benchtest program that comes with PSIM. > > Hm... Makes me wonder how fast it can get just by throwing out unnecessary > stuff (memory management). For what it worth, here are the configure options I used for the fastest PSIM build I ran: --enable-sim-cflags="-g0 -O2" \ --enable-sim-decode-mechanism=padded-switch \ --enable-sim-icache=1024 \ --enable-sim-filter="-f 64" \ --enable-sim-inline \ --enable-sim-bswap \ --enable-sim-endian=big-endian \ --enable-sim-model=MODEL_ppc604 \ --disable-sim-model-issue \ --disable-sim-regparm \ --disable-sim-smp \ --disable-sim-jump \ --disable-sim-monitor \ --disable-sim-stdcall \ --disable-sim-xor-endian \ --disable-sim-trace \ --disable-sim-assert Yes, the "padded-switch" implementation yielded better results than a direct threaded core on my K6-2... |