From: Lauri P. <lpe...@ni...> - 2000-08-19 01:38:44
|
On Thu, 17 Aug 2000 00:48:03 +0200, Gwenolé wrote: >BTW, I am surprised MSVC++ doesn't provide its own long double type >(80-bit long). Really nothing like __float80, __quadruple ? Not that I know of. There were 80 bits long doubles in the old 16-bit version of the compiler, but for some reason this support was dropped. I just grepped all the compiler include files with "float80" and "quadruple" -- no [relevant] hits. But it's always possible that I'm missing something. >I think that an implementation claiming IEEE-754 compliance would have >adequate float and double type representations. long doubles could also >be 128-bit long. Yes ... strictly speaking it's compliant, but adequate? Not for our purposes at least :) Lauri |