From: Kevin J. <kev...@hi...> - 2008-01-01 18:27:55
|
I'm not sure what Basilisk is, but the Sheepshaver site said to seek support on this forum. Many thanks to everybody working on Sheepshaver. I am having trouble moving files to and from the virtual Classic Mac. I am running Mac OS X.4 ("Tiger"). I see that my computer's actual startup volume appears on the virtual Classic desktop as "Unix". Only partial lists are being produced on the unix volume. For instance, and this is a big one, it doesn't see "/Applications (Mac OS 9)". And two other big ones are "/Users/Shared/Family Documents" and "Users/kj". Oddly, it does see "/Users/Shared/" and "Users/sj". I checked the permissions. Both Sheepshaver and Sheepshaver Gui are owned by kj with rwx, of the admin group with rwx, permitting guests with r--. Why am I only getting partial lists? My main need for Classic is to run InControl, which carries some 8000 tasks in hierarchical structure many with alarms. Exporting to a new program would be daunting. Besides, I haven't found any other task manager or calendar that permits you to add fields, customize views, attach alarms and organize it all hierarchically. Anyway, when I copied the files from the 'unix' drive to the 'bart os9' volume, I think they lost all their resources. Certainly the control panel was not recognized as such, nor could I launch the application by opening the data file, nor was the application recognized AS an application. So, how does one get Mac files INTO the virtual Classic after the volume is created, without losing all their essential Mac resources? Interestingly, the virtual Classic thought a folder was a file. Disturbingly, when I made a change to a directory using OS X, the virtual Classic which had an open window displaying that directory did not update the display. At least the reverse worked. When the virtual Classic wrote to a Unix directory, the Mac OS X window displaying that directory was immediately updated. -- Sincerely, Kevin Jaques (at home) Use ja...@hi... for work related messages "Send lawyers, guns and money! Dad get me out of this!" - Warren Zevon |
From: Kevin J. <kev...@hi...> - 2008-01-01 19:25:39
|
I think that may have been unclear. When I say, "only partial lists are being produced", I mean that when the Virtual Classic is asked to draw a Finder window depicting the contents of a directory on the unix 'volume', it only draws a partial list of the actual contents. It omits items, or "doesn't see" them. On Jan. 1, 2008, at 12:27 , Kevin Jaques wrote: > I'm not sure what Basilisk is, but the Sheepshaver site said to > seek support on this forum. Many thanks to everybody working on > Sheepshaver. > > I am having trouble moving files to and from the virtual Classic > Mac. I am running Mac OS X.4 ("Tiger"). I see that my computer's > actual startup volume appears on the virtual Classic desktop as > "Unix". > > Only partial lists are being produced on the unix volume. For > instance, and this is a big one, it doesn't see "/Applications (Mac > OS 9)". And two other big ones are "/Users/Shared/Family Documents" > and "Users/kj". Oddly, it does see "/Users/Shared/" and "Users/sj". > I checked the permissions. Both Sheepshaver and Sheepshaver Gui are > owned by kj with rwx, of the admin group with rwx, permitting > guests with r--. > > Why am I only getting partial lists? > > My main need for Classic is to run InControl, which carries some > 8000 tasks in hierarchical structure many with alarms. Exporting to > a new program would be daunting. Besides, I haven't found any other > task manager or calendar that permits you to add fields, customize > views, attach alarms and organize it all hierarchically. > > Anyway, when I copied the files from the 'unix' drive to the 'bart > os9' volume, I think they lost all their resources. Certainly the > control panel was not recognized as such, nor could I launch the > application by opening the data file, nor was the application > recognized AS an application. > > So, how does one get Mac files INTO the virtual Classic after the > volume is created, without losing all their essential Mac resources? > > Interestingly, the virtual Classic thought a folder was a file. > > Disturbingly, when I made a change to a directory using OS X, the > virtual Classic which had an open window displaying that directory > did not update the display. At least the reverse worked. When the > virtual Classic wrote to a Unix directory, the Mac OS X window > displaying that directory was immediately updated. > > > -- > Sincerely, Kevin Jaques (at home) > > Use ja...@hi... for work related messages > > "Send lawyers, guns and money! Dad get me out of this!" - Warren Zevon > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > --- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > basilisk-devel mailing list > bas...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/basilisk-devel -- Sincerely, Kevin Jaques (at home) Use ja...@hi... for work related messages "Send lawyers, guns and money! Dad get me out of this!" - Warren Zevon |
From: Joshua J. <jj...@gm...> - 2008-01-02 02:34:15
|
On Jan 1, 2008, at 10:27 AM, Kevin Jaques wrote: > I'm not sure what Basilisk is, but the Sheepshaver site said to > seek support on this forum. Basilisk II is a 68K Mac emulator, and SheepShaver shares some code with it. Including the external filesystem layer. > I am having trouble moving files to and from the virtual Classic > Mac. I am running Mac OS X.4 ("Tiger"). I see that my computer's > actual startup volume appears on the virtual Classic desktop as > "Unix". > > Why am I only getting partial lists? I don't know, but this might be a clue: > Welcome to Genie and Lamp <http://lamp.sourceforge.net/>. > > Shell spawned with pid 2 > $ ls -l /Volumes > total 0 > drwx------ 21 0 0 0 Jan 2 02:12 Rio > drwx------ 25975 0 0 0 Aug 5 12:45 Unix > $ Rio is the boot volume and has 19 items at root level as expected. My extfs folder has 24 and therefore should display 26 in the second column. (Genie/Lamp is a Unix-like environment that runs on traditional Mac OS.) > Anyway, when I copied the files from the 'unix' drive to the 'bart > os9' volume, I think they lost all their resources. Which version of SheepShaver are you using? The May 2006 release has a known issue of not byteswapping the file types and creators, so your applications become type 'LPPA' (assuming you're on Intel) and won't launch. > So, how does one get Mac files INTO the virtual Classic after the > volume is created, without losing all their essential Mac resources? I recommend asking the maintainers to release a new version of SheepShaver. Or you can try to build it yourself, but you're probably better off just getting someone who's already done so to email you a copy. > Disturbingly, when I made a change to a directory using OS X, the > virtual Classic which had an open window displaying that directory > did not update the display. This isn't a serious issue. Just close the folder's window and reopen it, and the items will be refreshed. Josh |
From: Alexei S. <isv...@sy...> - 2008-01-02 03:26:51
|
> I recommend asking the maintainers to release a new version of > SheepShaver. Or you can try to build it yourself, but you're > probably better off just getting someone who's already done so to > email you a copy. I don't do builds, and Gwenole's builds are quite a bit out of date. However, there is a site - Emaculation - which has forums for SheepShaver, and there are some unofficial builds there (as well as lots of feedback and suggestions from users). The URL to their forums is: http://emaculation.com/forum/ Hope that helps. -Alexei |
From: Jaime C. <jca...@gm...> - 2008-01-02 08:45:30
|
2008/1/2, Joshua Juran <jj...@gm...>: > On Jan 1, 2008, at 10:27 AM, Kevin Jaques wrote: > > > I'm not sure what Basilisk is, but the Sheepshaver site said to > > seek support on this forum. > > Basilisk II is a 68K Mac emulator, and SheepShaver shares some code > with it. Including the external filesystem layer. > It is a pity that Sheepshaver doesn't share more code or at least the feeling I have is that it is not designed in such a modular way... the low level unix/linux code seems to be spread over the main tree or code, while it should be just in the unix directory. Or at least it's not as clear. I know Sheepshaver has more complex emulation but I find the specific platform code not as "splitted" as in BasiliskII. I don't know if it still builds for PPC BeOS. I'm curious about it... does someone have tried to build it on PPC BeOS? -- Saludos/Best Regards Jaime Cagigal |