basilisk-devel

[B2-devel] New CVS snapshot of Basilisk II available

[Christian B. <cb...@st...>]

Hi!

I've made a new CVS snapshot of Basilisk II you can get it from:
  http://iphcip1.physik.uni-mainz.de/~cbauer/BasiliskII_src_31052001.tar.gz

The changes from the last snapshot are quite significant, with run-time
video and audio mode switching being the most useful one. A more complete
changelog is here:
  http://iphcip1.physik.uni-mainz.de/~cbauer/BasiliskII/ChangeLog_snapshot

And, yes, it's now Basilisk II V1.0. :-)

Bye,
Christian

-- 
  / Coding on PowerPC and proud of it
\/ http://www.uni-mainz.de/~bauec002/

Re: [B2-devel] New CVS snapshot of Basilisk II available

[Gwenole B. <gb...@di...>]

Hi Christian,

> I've made a new CVS snapshot of Basilisk II you can get it from:
>   http://iphcip1.physik.uni-mainz.de/~cbauer/BasiliskII_src_31052001.tar.=
gz

<http://iphcip1.physik.uni-mainz.de/~cbauer/BasiliskII_src_15012002.tar.gz>
is probably what you meant. ;-)

Bye,
Gwenol=E9.

Re: [B2-devel] New CVS snapshot of Basilisk II available

[Christian B. <cb...@st...>]

Hi!

On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 04:33:05PM +0100, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
> > I've made a new CVS snapshot of Basilisk II you can get it from:
> 
> <http://iphcip1.physik.uni-mainz.de/~cbauer/BasiliskII_src_15012002.tar.gz>
> is probably what you meant. ;-)

Uhm, yes. :-)

Bye,
Christian

-- 
  / Coding on PowerPC and proud of it
\/ http://www.uni-mainz.de/~bauec002/

Re: [B2-devel] New CVS snapshot of Basilisk II available

[Gwenole B. <gb...@di...>]

> And, yes, it's now Basilisk II V1.0. :-)

BTW, is the m68k->x86 JIT compiler supposed to be for 1.0 or should we
stabilize until 2.0 with a ppc->{x86,x86_64,[ia64]} as well? ;-)

Bye,
Gwenol=E9 in <hopes> mode.

Re: [B2-devel] New CVS snapshot of Basilisk II available

[Christian B. <cb...@st...>]

Hi!

On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 05:51:28PM +0100, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
> BTW, is the m68k->x86 JIT compiler supposed to be for 1.0 or should we
> stabilize until 2.0 with a ppc->{x86,x86_64,[ia64]} as well? ;-)

If the x86 backend is stable, it would be a nice inclusion for 1.0.

Bye,
Christian

-- 
  / Coding on PowerPC and proud of it
\/ http://www.uni-mainz.de/~bauec002/