Re: [Bashdb-devel] Bashdb-devel digest, Vol 1 #10 - 1 msg

[Masatake Y. <je...@gy...>]

> What you should use is in fact the patched version of gud.el in
> bash/debugger/emacs. That includes bashdb.el. I am given to believe
> that in a future version of emacs this in fact will appear. (I've sent
> in FSF release papers and they should be received by now).
Great! Could you apply the patch I attached to this mail before merging to
FSF official source tree?

> I suppose this we should remove so people don't get confused. Right? 
There is no problem when the code is merged. What the user have to do
is just M-x bashdb:)

The most important thing is bashdb itself. The quality of bashdb is high enough.
It should be merged to FSF official source tree maintained by Chet Ramey.
While a go, I thought I tried to contact with him. However, I thought 
the first contact should be done by the bashdb author, so I didn't try.

Masatake