Someone requested a non-emacs GUI. I had suggested ddd since it seemed
like the most versatile of the GUI front-ends and it seemed the easiest to do.
No rocket science here, but it was a bit more work that I had thought
it would be and the changes seemed to be pretty much scattered around
the the code.
The bad news is that ddd doesn't look like its maintained so I'm not
sure that the patches will be looked over and/or applied. I seem to be
a collector a projects which are not maintained or not maintained
cooperatively.
There's are some small loose ends and small features that could be
cleaned up. In some cases I found it expedient to change bashdb
messages to match gdb output more closely than add more code to ddd.
|
