From: Kern S. <ke...@si...> - 2002-04-21 17:04:12
|
Hello Phil, I didn't make any change, so I'm not sure what is going on. The "developer" configuration files are not processed by configure.in, so they will not have the passwords changed, but console.conf gnome-console.conf bacula-dir.conf bacula-sd.conf bacula-fd.conf all should have a randomly hashed password crammed into them. By the way, I'll apply your configure.in fix tomorrow or Tuesday, but can you explain to me how it is different from what I had done and why you need the eval. In my tests here that was not necessary. Best regards, Kern On Sun, 2002-04-21 at 18:49, Phil Stracchino wrote: > On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 09:45:53AM -0700, Phil Stracchino wrote: > > I notice that bacula-1.17 now stores the passwords in the conf files in > > plaintext instead of hashed. Not that it probably makes any functional > > difference, I was just curious why the change. > > > Hmmm...... except for gnome-console.conf, which is still storing it > hashed. Curious. Intentional? > > > -- > ********* Fight Back! It may not be just YOUR life at risk. ********* > phil stracchino :: al...@ba... :: hal...@so... > unix ronin :::: renaissance man :::: mystic zen biker geek > 2000 CBR929RR, 1991 VFR750F3 (foully murdered), 1986 VF500F (sold) > Linux Now! ...because friends don't let friends use Microsoft. > > _______________________________________________ > Bacula-users mailing list > Bac...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users |