Re: [Bacula-users] FreeBSD: HEADS UP - port changes

[Alan B. <aj...@ms...>]

On 27/10/12 20:04, Dan Langille wrote:

> Why is bacula-client now required by bacula-server?  A long standing problem between the two
> ports was they each installed the same shared libraries.  We solved this situation by making only bacula-client
> install the shared libraries.  This is why bacula-server requires bacula-client.

Why not do what linux porters did and create a bacula-common package 
containing the libraries, etc?