Re: [Bacula-users] voluseduration without effect

[Ralf G. <Ral...@ra...>]

Kern Sibbald said:
> On Thursday 23 February 2006 11:21, Ralf Gross wrote:
>> Volume Use Duration
>> [...]
>> The use duration is checked and the Used status is set only at the end
>> of
>> a job that writes to the particular volume, which means that even though
>> the use duration may have expired, the catalog entry will not be updated
>> until the next job that uses this volume is run.
>>
>> If I understand this right, I should never see the 'Used' state set by
>> 'Volume Use Duration' in the volume list, because it will only be
>> updated
>> by the next job that uses that tape. Does that make sense at all?
>
> Yea, it really should say "attempts" to use that volume.

Ok, but why did bacula mark the volume the week before as used, although
no job attempted to use it (see below). I see nothing related in the log
file, the last entry before the volume was marked as 'Used' was the auto
prune job the day before.

>> 13-Feb 17:17 bacula-dir: Begin pruning Jobs.
>> 13-Feb 17:17 bacula-dir: No Jobs found to prune.
>> 13-Feb 17:17 bacula-dir: Begin pruning Files.
>> 13-Feb 17:17 bacula-dir: No Files found to prune.
>> 13-Feb 17:17 bacula-dir: End auto prune.
>> 14-Feb 08:42 bacula-dir: Max configured use duration exceeded. Marking
>> Volume "Bang3-2006-02-08" as Used.

I still think I'm missing something...

Ralf