Re: [Bacula-users] update parameters

[Phil S. <al...@ca...>]

On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 06:59:25PM +0100, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > How about adding an 'Update Volume' command to go along with 'Update
> > Pool'?  This probably offers the best of both worlds.
> 
> Yes, that sounds like a good idea. I have no problems with something
> like that -- even something that says apply the Pool values to all the
> Volumes in the Pool.  The only problem with "update volume" is that it
> already exists as a command, which then prompts for the individual
> values to be updated. 
> 
> Perhaps:
> 
> update volume=xxx FromPool 
> 
> then we could also do:
> 
> update volumes FromPool
> 
> to update all volumes from the Pool. Obviously if there are more than
> one Pool, either you say:
> 
> update volumes FromPool Pool=xxx
> 
> or even
> 
> update volumes FromPool=xxx
> 
> What do you think?
> 
> Regards, Kern


That sounds like an excellent approach to me.


-- 
 .*********  Fight Back!  It may not be just YOUR life at risk.  *********.
 : phil stracchino : unix ronin : renaissance man : mystic zen biker geek :
 :  al...@ca...|phi...@ea...|ph...@no...  :
 :   2000 CBR929RR, 1991 VFR750F3 (foully murdered), 1986 VF500F (sold)   :
 :    Linux Now!   ...Because friends don't let friends use Microsoft.    :