Re: [Bacsharp-developers] BinaryNotes and BACnet ASN.1
Brought to you by:
anders-agren,
skarg
From: A. Å. <agr...@gm...> - 2008-02-18 08:10:51
|
Hi Steve! It was Andreas who tested Bnotes, so I can't really give you any more info there. However, I will look into Bnotes this week to gain some knowledge. Please contact Andreas Kahl for more info aoubout his Bnotes tests: ak...@us... or and...@we.... Best regrads, Anders 2008/2/13, Steve Karg <st...@ka...>: > > Hello Anders, > > I noticed your post on the Open Discussion forum in May about Binary > Notes and BACnet ASN.1 > http://sourceforge.net/projects/bnotes/ > > You said: > <quote> > I have tested the Bnotes ASN.1 compiler with the following results: > - 95% of BACnet ASN.1 protocol definitions could by compiled > - Compiler create 155 C# classes > - the BER en-/decoding of the BACnet PDUs works fine > > According this results a special en-/decoder should be written for > BACnet encoding rules. > </quote> > > Do you have BACnet ASN.1 used for testing Binary Notes? Is Binary > Notes a plausible way to go forward? I haven't tried to use Binary > Notes or the results of its compilation yet. I would guess that I > just cut/paste the Clause 21 ASN.1 from the BACnet standard. > > At a recent BACnet committee we discussed ASN.1 and agreed that if the > BACnet ASN.1 didn't compile cleanly that we should fix the BACnet > standard so that it is correct. > > Best Regards, > > Steve > -- > http://steve.kargs.net/ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > Bacsharp-developers mailing list > Bac...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacsharp-developers > |