From: <ca...@ma...> - 2011-03-05 05:45:15
|
To Whom it May Concern: Again to prove my point, I keep getting e-mails from whom ever it is and I would appreciate e-mail address removed from their list(s). Thank You, ca...@ma... At 02:59 PM 3/4/2011, you wrote: >On Mar 3, 2011, at 2:05 AM, Chris Parsons wrote: > >>reading this, and the other things you've sent, I wonder if it >>>would be better to forget about backward compatibility. >>>given the storage efficiency it's just not a huge burden to start >>>over. >> >>I would disagree. I would like to move to 4.0 - however, I need to bring >>my backup history with me. Otherwise the only method of upgrading is to >>move to a new server. Starting over means that I have no current backups. > >This may be the case with your configuration but it wouldn't be the case >for everyone. Many could just add another few disks to the server, >leave the old >backuppc there for restores, and be done. > >Obviously this should not be a *goal* but it has a cost, and the benefit >should be well understood too. >------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >What You Don't Know About Data Connectivity CAN Hurt You >This paper provides an overview of data connectivity, details >its effect on application quality, and explores various alternative >solutions. http://p.sf.net/sfu/progress-d2d >_______________________________________________ >BackupPC-devel mailing list >Bac...@li... >List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-devel >Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net >Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/ |