|
From: Les M. <les...@gm...> - 2010-10-09 18:01:42
|
On 10/9/10 11:42 AM, Xuo wrote:
>
>>> * Point 4 : it seems to be the most widely used but it needs so executables
>>> on all clients. This is a big disadvantage.
>> Yes, there are some tradeoffs. You could also use smb as the xfer method - with
>> the disadvantage of missing new files with old timestamps in incrementals.
> Hi,
>
> How can this happen ? If this file has an old timestamps, then it means
> that it was moved from a directory into the one which is saved. Then it
> is a new file, then it should be saved.
Using rsync, even locally with smb/cifs mounted targets will catch this. Using
smb or tar won't because they don't do a comparision against your existing tree
and have nothing to go on but the timestamps in incrementals.
--
Les Mikesell
les...@gm...
|