From: Mark A. <mar...@gm...> - 2008-12-12 18:41:10
|
Just wanted to post up a "me too!" I started to hand-edit the file just to make it read correctly, but it may not be such a big deal. Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote: > I did the first backup on a new machine but aborted it part way > through because I had the excludes wrong. It was recorded as a partial > level 0 backup. > > I then ran BackupPC_dump from the command line using '-i' > (incremental) which completed without errors > The partial backup was (appropriately) replaced by the new backup > which was (appropriately) assigned Type=full (since there were no > previous full backups). > > However, the first backup on my list now is: > > Backup# Type Filled Level > 0 full yes 1 > > This seems strange (at least at first glance) to have a "full" backup > that is not level 0. > > Is this intentional? If so, what is the reasoning behind it? > > Thanks > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada. > The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help > pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/ > _______________________________________________ > BackupPC-users mailing list > Bac...@li... > List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users > Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net > Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/ > > > -- Mark E. Adams Random Musing: Ask not for whom the <CONTROL-G> tolls. |