From: <wh...@do...> - 2013-05-31 08:40:01
|
Hi, I have errors with 1 host that I don't understand. There was one successful full backup, 1 incremental and since, only partial as it say "Got fatal error during xfer (Total bytes written: 70796951040) Backup aborted (Total bytes written: 70796951040) Not saving this as a partial backup since it has fewer files than the prior one (got 178665 and 178665 files versus 178665)" I try to exclude some file from backup but it still try to copy them. Example with 'UsrClass.dat': NT_STATUS_SHARING_VIOLATION opening remote file \Julien Noé\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\UsrClass.dat (\Julien Noé\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\) but i have defined an exclusion in the config.pl Could you give me some hint to bypass these problems ? Thanks. The backuppc server is a debian 7.0, backuppc 3.2.1-4. The host to save is a Windows 7 professionel SP1 -- Christophe Moille |
From: Michael S. <ms...@ch...> - 2013-05-31 12:18:15
|
> Hi, > > I have errors with 1 host that I don't understand. > There was one successful full backup, 1 incremental and since, only > partial as it say > "Got fatal error during xfer (Total bytes written: 70796951040) > Backup aborted (Total bytes written: 70796951040) > Not saving this as a partial backup since it has fewer files than the > prior one (got 178665 and 178665 files versus 178665)" > > I try to exclude some file from backup but it still try to copy them. > Example with 'UsrClass.dat': > NT_STATUS_SHARING_VIOLATION opening remote file \Julien > Noé\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\UsrClass.dat (\Julien > Noé\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\) > > but i have defined an exclusion in the config.pl You haven't defined the exclusion properly, or it would work. However, I can only speculate as to how you defined it, since you don't say. From the error, I can guess you're using samba. > Could you give me some hint to bypass these problems ? Thanks. > > The backuppc server is a debian 7.0, backuppc 3.2.1-4. > The host to save is a Windows 7 professionel SP1 > > -- > Christophe Moille Sure, you can: 1) Define the exclusion properly 2) Switch to rsync/vshadow, which could actually back up this file |
From: Christophe M. <wh...@do...> - 2013-05-31 15:27:18
Attachments:
signature.asc
|
Le Fri, May 31, 2013 at 07:18:07AM -0500, Michael Stowe a écrit : > > > I try to exclude some file from backup but it still try to copy them. > > Example with 'UsrClass.dat': > > NT_STATUS_SHARING_VIOLATION opening remote file \Julien > > Noé\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\UsrClass.dat (\Julien > > Noé\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\) > > > > but i have defined an exclusion in the config.pl > > You haven't defined the exclusion properly, or it would work. However, I > can only speculate as to how you defined it, since you don't say. From > the error, I can guess you're using samba. > > > Could you give me some hint to bypass these problems ? Thanks. > > > > The backuppc server is a debian 7.0, backuppc 3.2.1-4. > > The host to save is a Windows 7 professionel SP1 > > > > -- > > Christophe Moille > > Sure, you can: > 1) Define the exclusion properly Thank you for your response. I joined the config file with the original post. Could you have a look to the $Conf{BackupFilesExclude} variable and tell what's wrong ? And yes, it's a smb xfermethod. > 2) Switch to rsync/vshadow, which could actually back up this file I'll have a look to this method. -- Christophe Moille 09 50 72 75 25 La tolérance n'est pas une concession que je fais à l'autre ; c'est la reconnaissance de principe qu'une partie de la vérité m'échappe ! |
From: Michael S. <ms...@ch...> - 2013-05-31 16:08:12
|
> Le Fri, May 31, 2013 at 07:18:07AM -0500, Michael Stowe a écrit : >> >> > I try to exclude some file from backup but it still try to copy them. >> > Example with 'UsrClass.dat': >> > NT_STATUS_SHARING_VIOLATION opening remote file \Julien >> > Noé\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\UsrClass.dat (\Julien >> > Noé\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\) >> > >> > but i have defined an exclusion in the config.pl >> >> You haven't defined the exclusion properly, or it would work. However, >> I >> can only speculate as to how you defined it, since you don't say. From >> the error, I can guess you're using samba. >> >> > Could you give me some hint to bypass these problems ? Thanks. >> > >> > The backuppc server is a debian 7.0, backuppc 3.2.1-4. >> > The host to save is a Windows 7 professionel SP1 >> > >> > -- >> > Christophe Moille >> >> Sure, you can: >> 1) Define the exclusion properly > > Thank you for your response. I joined the config file with the original > post. Could you have a look to the $Conf{BackupFilesExclude} variable and > tell what's wrong ? > And yes, it's a smb xfermethod. Whoops, so you did, sorry about that. Samba can be weirdly touchy about its excludes, and I recall there being some variation across samba client versions. You have this: '*/Windows/UsrClass.dat*' to exclude this (as an example) \Julien Noé\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\UsrClass.dat I believe it's the trailing star which is causing this file not to be excluded -- I'd suggest trying this: '*/Windows/UsrClass.dat' If none of your excludes are working, then it might be the slashes instead: '*\\Windows\\UsrClass.dat' >> 2) Switch to rsync/vshadow, which could actually back up this file > > I'll have a look to this method. |
From: Eduardo D. R. <ed...@pk...> - 2013-06-01 19:09:19
|
Hi I am installing the last version of Backuppc 3.3.0 and see that debian-init script don't has the LBS tags. can anybody add to the file? for the next release? ### BEGIN INIT INFO # Provides: backuppc # Required-Start: $syslog $network $remote_fs # Required-Stop: $syslog $network $remote_fs # Should-Start: $local_fs # Should-Stop: $local_fs # Default-Start: 2 3 4 5 # Default-Stop: 0 1 6 # Short-Description: Launch backuppc server # Description: Launch backuppc server, a high-performance, # enterprise-grade system for backing up PCs. ### END INIT INFO I donwload this form the debian package administrator, and I think that can be very insteresing to install becasue in the new versions of debian is LBS based.. Regards! |
From: Michael S. <ms...@ch...> - 2013-06-01 21:26:48
|
> Hi I am installing the last version of Backuppc 3.3.0 and see that > debian-init script don't has the LBS tags. > > can anybody add to the file? for the next release? > > ### BEGIN INIT INFO > # Provides: backuppc > # Required-Start: $syslog $network $remote_fs > # Required-Stop: $syslog $network $remote_fs > # Should-Start: $local_fs > # Should-Stop: $local_fs > # Default-Start: 2 3 4 5 > # Default-Stop: 0 1 6 > # Short-Description: Launch backuppc server > # Description: Launch backuppc server, a high-performance, > # enterprise-grade system for backing up PCs. > ### END INIT INFO > > I donwload this form the debian package administrator, and I think that > can be very insteresing to install becasue in the new versions of debian > is LBS based.. > > Regards! You're likely to get better results if you: a) Do not reply to a random message in a thread, because many mail clients will still present your message in the original thread, despite you replacing the subject and body. b) Send your question to the Debian package maintainer, rather than an upstream list. Sure, it's possible the maintainer of the Debian package reads this list, or somebody else who happens to be into Debian, but nobody can actually do anything about it except the package maintainer c) By "LBS Tags" I'm going to assume you mean "LSB Fields" d) You can, of course, do it yourself: http://wiki.debian.org/LSBInitScripts |
From: Eduardo D. R. <ed...@pk...> - 2013-06-01 23:45:59
|
Yes sorry lsb A) this is not random is the backuppc list users isn't?? B) ??? This LSB is from Debian package admin.. D) yes thanks I know how to do myself, I don't need the help of any body to do this... That I like to said is.. Any developer can include this in the main stream for the debian-init file?.. Will be a good idea. No more I don't You don't help with this type of answers, Michael :( Enviado desde mi móvil Eduardo Díaz On 01/06/2013, at 23:26, "Michael Stowe" <ms...@ch...> wrote: > >> Hi I am installing the last version of Backuppc 3.3.0 and see that >> debian-init script don't has the LBS tags. >> >> can anybody add to the file? for the next release? >> >> ### BEGIN INIT INFO >> # Provides: backuppc >> # Required-Start: $syslog $network $remote_fs >> # Required-Stop: $syslog $network $remote_fs >> # Should-Start: $local_fs >> # Should-Stop: $local_fs >> # Default-Start: 2 3 4 5 >> # Default-Stop: 0 1 6 >> # Short-Description: Launch backuppc server >> # Description: Launch backuppc server, a high-performance, >> # enterprise-grade system for backing up PCs. >> ### END INIT INFO >> >> I donwload this form the debian package administrator, and I think that >> can be very insteresing to install becasue in the new versions of debian >> is LBS based.. >> >> Regards! > > You're likely to get better results if you: > > a) Do not reply to a random message in a thread, because many mail clients > will still present your message in the original thread, despite you > replacing the subject and body. > > b) Send your question to the Debian package maintainer, rather than an > upstream list. Sure, it's possible the maintainer of the Debian package > reads this list, or somebody else who happens to be into Debian, but > nobody can actually do anything about it except the package maintainer > > c) By "LBS Tags" I'm going to assume you mean "LSB Fields" > > d) You can, of course, do it yourself: http://wiki.debian.org/LSBInitScripts > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite > It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production > Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with <2% overhead. > Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_ap2 > _______________________________________________ > BackupPC-users mailing list > Bac...@li... > List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users > Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net > Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/ > |
From: Michael S. <ms...@ch...> - 2013-06-02 13:35:06
|
> Yes sorry lsb > > A) this is not random is the backuppc list users isn't?? You're missing the point -- you didn't send an email to <bac...@li...>, you replied to an email from the list. This puts the message you replied to in the headers, which can make your message difficult to locate (or ignored, because people see it as a reply to the message you replied to.) My point is that in the future, starting a new email and sending it to the list is less likely to get ignored (as opposed to hitting "reply".) |
From: Craig B. <cba...@us...> - 2013-06-02 01:04:12
|
Eduardo, Can you send me a complete debian-init file please? Craig |