|
From: Bruce M. <br...@mc...> - 2003-05-25 23:12:29
|
Hans, No, that sounds fine. Are all your efforts to JAXM complete? I want to expand the soap functionality within babeldoc a lot. At the moment I believe that we can make SOAP the remote mechanism of choice instead of RMI, IIOP, etc. What are your thoughts here? regards, Bruce. On Friday 23 May 2003 09:53 am, Hans Benedict wrote: > On Fri, 23 May 2003, Bruce McDonald wrote: > > We should look into changing from soap4j to Axis for soap access. > > Hans, since you seem to be the most knowledgeable in this area, what are > > your opinions? > > After some discussions we had here, I have ported the soap module (which > actually used apache soap) to jaxm/saaj completely. > > Do we use soap4j anywhere else? > > If you want to use an apache api for "political reasons" (becoming an > apache project), I could propably also port it to axis. > > Regards, > Hans > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: ObjectStore. > If flattening out C++ or Java code to make your application fit in a > relational database is painful, don't do it! Check out ObjectStore. > Now part of Progress Software. http://www.objectstore.net/sourceforge > _______________________________________________ > Babeldoc-devel mailing list > Bab...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/babeldoc-devel |