From: Borja F. <bor...@gm...> - 2013-06-12 17:30:53
|
Yes I will reply there. 2013/6/12 Weddington, Eric <Eri...@at...> > Hi All, > > See below. > > What do you guys say about the status of the port, per the question at > bottom? > > Borja, you probably know the best. > > Eric > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Anitha B Gollamudi [mailto:ani...@gm...] > > Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 1:18 AM > > To: Weddington, Eric > > Cc: ll...@cs... > > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] AVR back end > > > > On 11 June 2013 00:32, Weddington, Eric <Eri...@at...> > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > For quite some time there's been a side project for developing an AVR > > back > > > end for LLVM: > > > http://sourceforge.net/projects/avr-llvm/ > > > > > > > Eric, > > > > Interesting. I tried few non-trivial programs on linux. They got > > compiled :-) > > > > I would say this is the right time to get the target to ToT. Ofcourse > > compiling at -O0 looks like a problem. > > > > While I understand that it is still a pre-alpha version as noted on > > website, can you roughly outline the level of backend (llc) support? > > (for e.g, basic/OK/pretty much all ISA support, target specific > > optimizations - none/few/many) > > > > > > -Anitha > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: > > Build for Windows Store. > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > avr-llvm-devel mailing list > avr...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/avr-llvm-devel > |