From: Borja F. <bor...@gm...> - 2013-06-10 20:31:55
|
Oh that was fast! I will take a read about the dev policy later. 2013/6/10 Weddington, Eric <Eri...@at...> > Here's one response... > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Eli Friedman [mailto:eli...@gm...] > > Sent: Monday, June 10, 2013 1:45 PM > > To: Weddington, Eric > > Cc: ll...@cs... > > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] AVR back end > > > > On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Weddington, Eric > > <Eri...@at...> wrote: > > > > > > Hi All, > > > > For quite some time there's been a side project for developing an > > AVR back end for LLVM: > > http://sourceforge.net/projects/avr-llvm/ > > > > What is required from us to be able to add this work to the LLVM > > repo? > > > > > > > > http://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html is the general developer docs > > (see in particular "Making a major change" and "incremental > > development"); the only thing that's really specific to backends is > > that each backend has to have an active LLVM developer who owns it. > > > > > > And when do you think would be a good time for us to do that? > > > > > > As soon as possible. (Even if it isn't ready, sending in patches which > > can get reviewed as soon as possible is important; the review process > > can take a while for a major change.) > > > > -Eli > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: > > Build for Windows Store. > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > avr-llvm-devel mailing list > avr...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/avr-llvm-devel > |