From: <sch...@kw...> - 2013-06-10 19:46:37
|
On Mon, 10 Jun 2013 21:12:58 +0200, Borja Ferrer wrote > Adding a backend to LLVM is not an easy thing to do, there was a discussion > in the llvm mailing list some time ago about merging experimental > backends, and even the devs didnt seem to agree too much. They don't > like mantaining backends each time a modification has to be done. I > think they proposed to have new backends in some experimental branch > and if after some time they got positive feedback they would be > finally merged to trunk. Yes, that thread starts here: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2012-July/051929.html The most recent discussions about adding specific new backends are: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2013-March/060015.html http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2013-March/060508.html http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2013-April/061170.html (I think...) -- Kevin Schoedel <sch...@kw...> VA3TCS |