From: John M. <ato...@gm...> - 2013-06-10 18:27:39
|
Like Stepan has said, maintaining the patches with SVN on an out-of-tree project often causes issues. If we just had one big monolithic patch then it wouldn't be an issue. I suspect doing major work on parts of LLVM outside of *lib/target/AVR *will also cause similar maintainability issues uses SVN. On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 10:46 AM, Stepan Dyatkovskiy <stp...@na...>wrote: > Hi Borja, > I think John means all this stuff with .diff files that lies under svn. > > I've tried several mid-January revisions with r247. But I couldn't get > compilable version. Would you tell me please what "svn info" says in > your llvm project? > > All AVR tests has been failed after my own sync (r244). Seems I've > missed something. > > -Stepan. > > Borja Ferrer wrote: > > Eric, what do you exactly mean? Trunk changes in LLVM are automatically > > merged in your local repo when you update, and when we need to update > > our code base to fix interface changes we have to do it manually but > > that's the only way I know of. > > > > Stepan: the old sourceforge repo > > (http://avr-llvm.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/avr-llvm/) should work with > > the LLVM trunk version of that time (mid january). I have to update our > > code to latest LLVM trunk so we can compile the backend with their > > newest code. What tests are failing for you? IIRC i only got failures > > with tests not related with our backend. And another thing, are you > > working on adding inline asm support? > > > > > > 2013/6/10 Stepan Dyatkovskiy <stp...@na... <mailto: > stp...@na...>> > > > > Guys, my sync + r244 gave me AVR test failures. Do you have > > somewhere repo with actual things (even with old llvm) ? > > -Stepan > > > > Borja Ferrer wrote: > > > > Wow the SF migration has messed my last 5 commits, John I just > > noticed > > that you merged some of them into the new repo but some are > > still missing. > > > > Regarding the status since it has been asked, the most important > > thing > > to be done in the backend side is inline asm support, as John > > mentioned > > the backend should be able to compile now any feature except for > > this. > > The frontend needs some more work, basically getting a working > > toolchain > > done. > > > > About the version control in atmel spaces, I'm only familiar > > with CVS > > and SVN, never worked before with git and mercurial. > > > > > > > ------------------------------__------------------------------__------------------ > > How ServiceNow helps IT people transform IT departments: > > 1. A cloud service to automate IT design, transition and > operations > > 2. Dashboards that offer high-level views of enterprise services > > 3. A single system of record for all IT processes > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/__servicenow-d2d-j > > <http://p.sf.net/sfu/servicenow-d2d-j> > > > > > > > > _________________________________________________ > > avr-llvm-devel mailing list > > avr-llvm-devel@lists.__sourceforge.net > > <mailto:avr...@li...> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/__lists/listinfo/avr-llvm-devel > > <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/avr-llvm-devel> > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: > > Build for Windows Store. > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > avr-llvm-devel mailing list > avr...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/avr-llvm-devel > |