From: Nicklas Bo J. <nbj...@gm...> - 2012-04-23 21:22:10
|
Hi, I'll be happy to contribute, after I have fixed my issues getting avr-llvm to compile in the first place. BR, Nicklas On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 7:26 PM, Borja Ferrer <bor...@gm...> wrote: > I think it's time to stop adding more features until we cover what is > currently implemented with regression tests. Otherwise the further we go > the harder will be to cover everything up, from now on it's going to be > easier to go in parallel. > In the past emails I've seen people interested in helping out with this, > it's a good way of starting with some development becuase it's an easy task > to do and it helps to understand how llvm works, so anybody interested > check in here so I know if I'm going to have any help at all or I have to > do it myself. > > So if there's some help available we can plan in this thread what needs to > get covered and how to do it, I'll wait a few days for any replies. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second. > Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You. > Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2 > _______________________________________________ > avr-llvm-devel mailing list > avr...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/avr-llvm-devel > > |