Re: [avr-llvm-devel] Flash data

[Anton S. <an...@so...>]

On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 12:34 PM, John Myers <ato...@gm...> wrote:
> I share Anton's concern about __flash not being a type qualifier.
> Will __flash behave as a type qualifier?
>    int __flash * __flash c;
> If not and a __flash type qualifier had to be created then the constness of
> the qualifier would be an inherent feature of the  __flash type qualifier.

Yes, I think it's important that __flash be a qualifier.  We can
probably decouple that requirement from whether or not __flash implies
constness.

-Anton