Re: [avr-llvm-devel] Interrupt handling

[Weddington, E. <Eri...@at...>]

Agreed. ;-)

Eric

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Borja Ferrer [mailto:bor...@gm...]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2012 12:44 PM
> To: Weddington, Eric
> Cc: avr...@li...
> Subject: Re: [avr-llvm-devel] Interrupt handling
> 
> In my opinion the best thing should be to error out, it doesn't make
sense to
> set this attributes in non void functions. Technically from a codegen
> perspective it doesn't matter because registers are all saved and
restored
> unless the naked attrib is set so it wouldnt't make a difference
except for
> some useless instructions. Doing this kind of things shows that the
programmer
> doesn't understand what he's doing.
> I issued the warning to be sort of backwards compat with gcc, although
in this
> case we would be supporting wrong code. In conclusion, error out.
> 
>