Re: [avr-llvm-devel] Current Status?

[Borja F. <bor...@gm...>]

Update: I've already started working on conditional branches and compares.
Eric ping?

2012/1/20 Borja Ferrer <bor...@gm...>

> Ahh ok thanks for the info Eric, about the work on doubles, what sort of
> support is it? shouldn't that go into write the math functions in the C
> library? or do you mean removing the constraint of making double a float?
> Is there a place on how the multiple address space feature will work, we
> should implement this aswell in an early stage so it's important that we
> see how it works to be compatible with what gcc does.
>
> 2012/1/16 Weddington, Eric <Eri...@at...>
>
>
>>
>>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Borja Ferrer [mailto:bor...@gm...]
>> > Sent: Friday, January 13, 2012 9:19 AM
>> > To: Weddington, Eric
>> > Cc: Sherard Dames; avr...@li...
>> > Subject: Re: [avr-llvm-devel] Current Status?
>> >
>> > Eric one more thing, you mentioned that some work has been done lately
>> in
>> > gcc's backend, can you tell me what are the main features added and if
>> > there are any code quality improvements.
>>
>> Umpf. There's been so much happening, I'm not sure if I can remember it
>> all
>>
>> - Improvements in the AVR backend, especially a number of missed
>> optimization bugs fixed
>>
>> - The beginning of a Multiple Address Spaces feature
>>
>> - The beginning of 24-bit types, mainly used for Multiple Address Spaces
>> (i.e. large code space, or large data space)
>>
>> - Some work done on 64-bit double types
>>
>> And other fixed bugs.
>>
>> Eric
>>
>
>