From: Anton S. <an...@so...> - 2011-06-23 03:49:02
|
> > Your patches are on the right track, however please dont spend much time > taking a look and working with the current backend in SVN because it's going > to be completely replaced. I would recommend taking a read through previous > threads in the mailing list to take a grasp of what is the current status > and what are the problems we've been having and how some have been resolved, > I would say bacl from October-2010 to today. Many interface changes are > happening in LLVM so I doubt the backend compiles at all for the latest > release. > Yup, that's what I had gathered. I am very much looking forward to the new back-end going up. I'd love to help out with it. As a short summary, I have a more developed backend out of SVN with a > completely different design (you can read about it in older threads) that > has to be uploaded. Currently, I'm working on everything related to frame > stuff which is a big milestone. I have to ask something to the llvm devs > because I'm stuck on something before continuing the work. > Indeed, I was tracking your conversation about function preambles. It seems like while supporting both the IAR and GCC styles would be very useful (perhaps with IAR behind a flag) it would also be considerable work. Have you decided on a stack management style? You mentioned about helping on the Clang side, that would be awesome because > right now nobody is working on that, and indeed, all the address space stuff > has to be resolved, so your work there would be really appreciated. > Good to hear, I've been continuing to experiment there. PS: since mid may I'm inactive because of my finals until july so i wont be > able to resume work until then, but i'll keep reading the mailing list to > follow up any discussions. > Good luck on your finals. Thanks, Anton |