Re: [avr-llvm-devel] About rev 108

[Borja F. <bor...@gm...>]

Well, i dont really care either, my current local setup is to only support
v2.8 and not trunk, this was my though on how it was going to be done. I
noticed these changes in llvm's rep but didnt apply them because my idea was
to merge them once we switched to 2.9.
So if we have to work with trunk as the codebase instead of 2.8 now is the
moment to decide.

2010/11/17 John Myers <ato...@gm...>

>
>
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 3:58 AM, Borja Ferrer <bor...@gm...>wrote:
>
>> Hello John i'm not at home now to check this but i've noticed your last
>> commit introduces a change that im unsure now if it's compatible with our
>> current code base which is v2.8.
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
> Yeah, the last few commits have been to synchronize with the LLVM trunk. I
> guess this is one if the development decisions we should have discussed
> before continuing. The way we were doing it before was to try to keep the
> avr-llvm trunk up to date with the LLVM trunk.
>
> There are pros and cons for both methods (incremental vs. single shot). The
> other devs wanted to incrementally keep up with the LLVM trunk, but
> personally I don't have a strong opinion either way.
>