Re: [avr-llvm-devel] Windows build

[John M. <ato...@gm...>]

LOL, I must have had a bad build after I added that because original I
didn't see any changes.

On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 7:08 AM, Josef Eisl <za...@za...> wrote:

> John Myers wrote:
> >     What's up with the redundant mov? Or will future optimization take
> >     care of removing this?
> >
> >     >         ret
> >     >         .size   func, .-func
> >     >
> >     >
> >
> > The redudant mov is gone now. So it looks like whatever they changed  in
> > the LLVM trunk fixed it.
>
> Nope. You fixed it in r53 ;)! The isMoveInstr() allows llvm to detect
> redundant MOVs.
> BTW: great work!
>
> Josef
>