Re: [avr-llvm-devel] Windows build

[Josef E. <za...@za...>]

John Myers wrote:
>     What's up with the redundant mov? Or will future optimization take
>     care of removing this?
> 
>     >         ret
>     >         .size   func, .-func
>     >
>     >
> 
> The redudant mov is gone now. So it looks like whatever they changed  in
> the LLVM trunk fixed it.

Nope. You fixed it in r53 ;)! The isMoveInstr() allows llvm to detect
redundant MOVs.
BTW: great work!

Josef