Re: [avr-llvm-devel] current status and future direction oftheavr-llvm project

[Weddington, E. <Eri...@at...>]

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Myers [mailto:ato...@gm...] 
> Sent: Friday, November 27, 2009 6:39 PM
> To: avr...@li...
> Subject: Re: [avr-llvm-devel] current status and future 
> direction oftheavr-llvm project
> 
> RE: patch creation guidelines / standards
> 
> Hello,
> 
> Do you guys prefer making separate patch files for each 
> source file or making one patch file based on the type of 
> 'fix' it was for.
> For example we have a Triple.h.diff and Triple.cpp.diff but 
> we could make just one instead like...
> 
> $    svn diff lib/Support/Triple.cpp 
> include/llvm/ADT/Triple.h > Triple.dif

Patch-per-source-file doesn't make any sense. I've always worked on patch-per-logical-change which can span multiple files and directories.