Re: [avr-llvm-devel] Change to AVR.td committed

[Josef E. <za...@za...>]

Weddington, Eric wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> We should probably set up a 'commits' mailing list and have commit messages go to that.

It seems there is a avr-llvm-commits list up and running. Whoever set it
up, thanks :).

> I just made a change to AVR.td on HEAD. Honestly I haven't tested it yet (I know, I should do that). I reworked the subtarget features and added *all* of the AVR device names, including a bunch of new ones (which I'm adding to AVR GCC right now as well). The subtarget features should also more closely match what is being specified in GCC 4.3.x. Obviously, because some were removed, and some had name changes, this will have to be re-worked in the rest of the code. But I thought this would be a start.

I've checked it against llvm 2.6. Seems to work. I agree, we should  be
consistent with gcc as much as it makes sense. Choosing the same name
for same feature is definitely reasonable. Nice work btw.

Josef