1. I would like that a class will be added to perform thread unsafe function or method calls in an easy way like I describe it in the request "https://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=1585197&forum_id=24972" for the TCL thread package.
2. Can the source code "http://groups.google.de/groups?group=comp.programming.threads&selm=40ed1d8f.0311150646.4641684a%40posting.google.com" be improved with your classes?
3. Would you like to support that work or command objects can be sent to a target thread like that can be done with TCL scripts by the function "thread::send"?
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/\*checkout*/tcl/thread/doc/html/thread.html?rev=1.15
4. Would you like to add a comparison for the performance of a queue, ring buffer and stack implementation if they manage a single entry as a test case?
Logged In: YES
user_id=39343
1. I don't really understand what this requires.
2. What are you trying to achieve exactly ? I think that
you can use a C++ template to achieve this.
Somthing like :
class T;
T v;
int r = ThreadSafe(v, T::f, mutex ).Call<int>()( args ... );
3. I will be implementing action list/thread pool support.
4. Unit test cases are good. I'd like to add many of them.
Logged In: YES
user_id=572001
2. Would you like to encapsulate the use case that is also
described in the message
"http://groups.google.de/groups?threadm=OtKbb.127587%24mp.64498%40rwcrnsc51.ops.asp.att.net"
by C++ means?
3. That are interesting news.
But it is not the suggested interface for command objects.
Logged In: YES
user_id=572001
2. Would you like to reuse anything from this code?
http://groups.google.de/groups?threadm=34fu29F49rvasU1%40individual.net