|
From: Paul M. <pa...@pa...> - 2018-05-18 15:18:44
|
On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 5:44 AM, Jiri Jaburek <jja...@re...> wrote: > I unfortunately don't think I have the time needed to do upstream work > for the project. I also don't think it's really worth putting the effort > in - these days, you have things like > > https://github.com/SELinuxProject/selinux-testsuite > https://github.com/linux-audit > > in addition to LTP and other projects. On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 5:43 AM, Cyril Hrubis <ch...@su...> wrote: > Given that there are upstream repositories for audit and selinux it > would probably makes sense to reuse these for the certification purposes > in the long term. Granted my CC evaluation experience is quite old at this point, but I don't believe the current selinux-testsuite and audit-testsuite are sufficient, or even close to being sufficient, for CC evaluation. While I think both of those test suites could benefit from addition tests, the audit-testsuite is especially lacking, I believe that adding the tests necessary for CC certification is out-of-scope for those test suites. There is a reason why I started maintaining those test suites again and didn't attempt to use the audit-test suite. Regardless, it looks like the larger problem is a lack of resources needed to maintain the audit-test test suite. That's unfortunate, but I don't see any way to change that. -- paul moore www.paul-moore.com |