Re: [Audacity-devel] VAMP (was wx 2.8 needed?)

[James C. <cr...@in...>]

VAMP being 'Debug wx284' at this stage looks to be the best choice then. 
  I'd be happy with that.

--James.




Vaughan Johnson wrote:
> I prefer to be strict about adding to the code base if it's not going to 
> be tested before release. So if we're actually planning to release a 
> 1.3.4, I think it's okay to build it in. If we're not doing a 1.3.4, or 
> if we plan to release 1.3.4 strictly to test bug fixes, then I vote 
> against (but it should be fine in the 'Debug wx284' config.
> 
> So, are we doing a 1.3.4 release? If so, bug fixes only? If not bug 
> fixes only, does that mean a 1.3.5 for testing bug fixes?
> 
> - Vaughan
> 
> 
> James Crook wrote:
>> ...
>> Two questions for developers on this list:
>>
>>   - OK for this to be built in to 1.3.4/1.4?
>>   - If NO, then OK for me to add it to 'Debug wx284' only, so that it is 
>> at least in CVS HEAD but not built with our production build configurations?
>>
>> --James.