Re: [Audacity-devel] Re: Other Selling Offences questions. 43007999 #UK RD1 US L11 (KMM79706187V875L0KM)

[Matt B. <mbr...@cs...>]

Daniel James wrote:

> I don't know how familiar you are with the GNU GPL, but violating the
> license - in just one example in this case, by not disclosing source
> code availability - means that the license violator loses the right to
> distribute the software.

Do we have any evidence that Luxuriousity is violating the GPL?  As far
as I can tell, he is not.  There is no requirement to "disclose source
code vulnerability" before the software is distributed.

As long as the CDs he is selling include a copy of the GPL, and either
the source code or a written offer to provide source, then I think that
licensing is not an issue.

If we have evidence that the license was violated then we should pursue
it; otherwise we should avoid making false or unsupported accusations.