It seems there is both an rhpl.arch and a yum.rpmUtils.arch containing
"the same code".
Any idea why this is?
Note the latest yum.rpmUtils.arch seems to be more up-to-date? Since
it provides some more functions: isMultiLibArch, getBestArchFromList,
getArchList, getBaseArch. The rest is identical.
Anyway, it seems this file contains a list of supported arches, so I'm
guessing this is my best entry for getting support for installing
x86_586 MontaVista Linux packages (more on this tomorrow).