I've been in touch with a few people who are having problems compiling AT on different Linux distributions.
In particular, atmexall seems to work, but then when tracking, the passfunction or track function aren't found.
Others having this problem?
I think it requires an adjustment of the compilation flags with the mex command, but didn't understand the details yet.
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
I could not use AT 1.4 under ubuntu 16.04 system.
After setting up the path, I used atmexall command to compile the corresponding files, then it shows ALL mex-files created successfully. But there is a warning: You are using gcc version '5.4.0'. The version of gcc is not supported. The version currently supported with
MEX is '4.9.x'.
It is not easy to use gcc 4.9.x to replace gcc 5.4.0. Is it possible to adjust the source code a bit?
Ji from HZB
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Anonymous
Anonymous
-
2017-08-20
Post awaiting moderation.
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
I've been in touch with a few people who are having problems compiling AT on different Linux distributions.
In particular, atmexall seems to work, but then when tracking, the passfunction or track function aren't found.
Others having this problem?
I think it requires an adjustment of the compilation flags with the mex command, but didn't understand the details yet.
View and moderate all "AT1.4 discussion" comments posted by this user
Mark all as spam, and block user from posting to "Discussion"
I could not use AT 1.4 under ubuntu 16.04 system.
After setting up the path, I used atmexall command to compile the corresponding files, then it shows ALL mex-files created successfully. But there is a warning: You are using gcc version '5.4.0'. The version of gcc is not supported. The version currently supported with
MEX is '4.9.x'.
It is not easy to use gcc 4.9.x to replace gcc 5.4.0. Is it possible to adjust the source code a bit?
Ji from HZB