Re: [asycxx-devel] Documentation changes query

[Joe S. <js...@hi...>]

On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 12:06 +0530, Karthik Balakrishnan wrote:

> Alright. I got few files fixed as noted. But I wasn't sure if i was on
> the right track. I'll send you the patch file tonight/later this
> evening.

Alright. In fact it makes sense to move 'api documentation' to the .h
files. All public and protected methods need to come in the api docs.
The private methods can be simply documented (without doxygen tags) for
our own reference.

> I need 1 more clarification. There is a file core.cxx which is not
> part of/class in itself. Should I alter this file and call it say
> Utils class ? 

That file simply contains some common functions used everywhere. It
makes sense to put them as static functions in a 'Utils' class, coz we
dont want to associate them to an object. But, well. It is totally
internal to us, so I dont care.

> Since this method is used within the asycxx code, i'll create the
> class structure in the .cxx file itself.

I did not understand this. 

-- 
Joe Steeve
HiPro IT Solutions Pvt. Ltd.
http://hipro.co.in/