Re: [Asunit-users] asyncronous individual test, *not* asynch setup?

[Paul B. <eye...@gm...>]

Hi matey  - long time no chat...

I use async tests for testing method calls that you expect to trigger
an event at some time in the future.So lets say for example that I
have a class that takes some xml, does some shizzle with it and
broadcasts an event when its done.

I would use standard overriding of run to load the xml - so far so
good, but testing that this class dispatches an event when
parseMyStuff gets called is a testMethod specific async case. there
may be another test method within the same testCase that sends its
result immediately, and I certainly wouldnt want to call parseMyStuff
in the setup (as its specific to just one test)

make sense, or am i just rambling?

PBH

On 6/20/06, Alias <ali...@gm...> wrote:
> Hi Paul!
>
> Why can't you override run? Where does the result come from?
>
> Cheers,
> Alias
>
> On 6/20/06, Paul BH <eye...@gm...> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >  me again - I have another situation, that Im not sure if anyone has
> > come across / solved?
> >
> > I need to be able to run a test whose result is asynchronous. This is
> > not necessarily the same as an asynchronous setup, so I dont really
> > want to be overriding run (which is what i normally do with an async
> > test...)
> >
> > has anyone done this, got a strategy for doing this in ASUnit (3)?
> >
> > ta
> >
> > PBH
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Asunit-users mailing list
> > Asu...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/asunit-users
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Asunit-users mailing list
> Asu...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/asunit-users
>