Re: [Astlinux-users] GL.iNet. How good is it?

[Lonnie A. <li...@lo...>]

I have always heard good things about the GL.iNet products, but never personally tested one.

Are you considering the older (inexpensive) Mango/Shadow or the newer Brume 2 gateway ?

Their continued firmware support looks good. [1]

GL.iNet embraced WireGuard early on, which was a perfect match for their lower-end CPUs.

Lonnie

[1] https://dl.gl-inet.com/



> On Nov 16, 2023, at 5:01 AM, Michael Keuter <li...@mk...> wrote:
> 
> Hi Michael,
> 
> I have a few of them privately as travelrouter (Creta + Beryl), and 2 of them at customers (Creta), but only for remote VPN use.
> I have tested them not with AstLinux yet. They are running stable, and they are based on OpenWRT (but an older version).
> 
> Michael
> 
> http://www.mksolutions.info
> 
>> Am 16.11.2023 um 10:12 schrieb Michael Knill <mic...@ip...>:
>> 
>> Hi All
>> I am looking to start using these as my telephony gateway VPN router device e.g. phones within a clients network using this gateway to connect via Wireguard VPN to the cloud Astlinux system.
>> It looks perfect and initial playing has been positive. You can even cloud manage it which is a bonus.
>> Just checking if anyone has had any experience with GL.iNet products and this is not too good to be true.
>> Regards
>> Michael Knill
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Astlinux-users mailing list
> Ast...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users
> 
> Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to pa...@kr....