Re: [Astlinux-users] unionFS compile error WAS trunk astmanproxycompile error

[Kristian K. <kri...@gm...>]

On 3/1/07, ast...@el... <ast...@el...> wrote:
>
> Using rev 684, I managed to finish a compile. I was wondering though,
> unionFS seems like a good idea to have though, having a clean mixed RO/RW
> setup. I don't have a clear understanding of the current filesystem
> structure for AstLinux though. Does this mean we should favor a lvm setup
> then?
>

asterisk,

  rev 684 still has unionfs.  It is applied as a patch to the kernel
and built into bzImage.

  Over the next week or so I will finish integrating unionfs into
AstLinux.  I'll be announcing the new features shortly.

-- 
Kristian Kielhofner