From: Phil M. <ph...@mc...> - 2007-01-02 00:25:51
|
Happy New Year everybody, and thanks for all your replies to my earlier = query on this subject on the old mailing list.=20 =20 I've held off replying while I did a bit more research about using = astlinux as a router, to avoid making a complete fool of myself in = public. But I still don't understand it all, so here goes anyway. :-) =20 I've got no problem with throttling my external connection to 90% of the = available bandwidth to avoid queueing problems. Obviously it would be = nice to have a system that copes with congestion without configuration, = but I can live with it.=20 =20 I've discovered elsewhere that the net4801 won't cope with 100 Mbit/s = ethernet routing (between PCs on my SoHo LAN) but should cope with my 4 = Mbit/s internet connection OK. This is as I suspected, although it does = make me wonder why my (much cheaper!) Netgear router copes with it all = right - presumably it contains special hardware. This in turn makes me = wonder whether the net4801 was a good choice of hardware for this sort = of thing. Anyway, I think I can avoid all the speed problems by simply = connecting my Netgear router downstream from the astlinux box, with my = PCs connected to the router and my phones to the astlinux box. It's = twice as much cable but what the heck. I'm a bit puzzled that PBX-only mode is now the default, since that = implies no traffic shaping, which I would have thought would guarantee = problems whenever a big download or upload was in progress. What do = people do in this situation? Use a separate internet connection? Or a = clever router? Anyway, I now want to enable the other ethernet ports on my box, and = it's not obvious how to do this from reading rc.conf. My net4801 has = seven ports (which now looks like a mistake). Assuming I was happy with = slower speeds I still don't see how I can configure the unit to connect = several phones or PCs to it. Is there a hidden assumption here that I'm = missing, that an external router is always used? In PBX-only mode the = phones connect to the EXTERNAL interface (the only one active by = default), right? So the asterisk box is just another device on the = internal LAN, rather than being physically connected between the phones = and the external internet as I had assumed. If so, then I think I need = to buy yet another router. :-( I hope this is all clear. Maybe a couple of diagrams would help: 1. This is how I originally expected to connect things: __________ =20 | |----IP Phone INTERNET---| astlinux |----IP Phone ... | box |----Computer |__________|----Computer ... 2. I now think PBX-only mode is meant to be connected like this: ________ | Router |----IP Phone | |----IP Phone ... INTERNET---| | __________ | |---| astlinux | | | | box | |________| |__________| 3. And this is how I now think the PCs should be connected: ________ | Router |----IP Phone | |----IP Phone INTERNET---| | __________ ________ | |---| astlinux |----| Fast |----Computer | | | box | | Router |----Computer ... |________| |__________| |________| Does that make sense? -- Phil McKerracher www.mckerracher.net |