Re: [Astlinux-devel] SE is not so stable Im afraid

[Michael K. <li...@mk...>]

> Am 21.05.2020 um 02:21 schrieb Michael Knill <mic...@ip...>:
> 
> Thanks Lonnie
> 
> I certainly want to go down the path of pushing SE to at least 13.29. Nice there is no pjsip.

It think that would be a good idea bumping SE to 13.29.2 + secutity updates.

> I'm wondering though about the point considering that its only Security fixes at the end of October which is probably something I would like to keep in the release?
> 
> What do you think?
> 
> Regards
> Michael Knill
> 
> On 20/5/20, 10:39 pm, "Lonnie Abelbeck" <li...@lo...> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On May 20, 2020, at 4:41 AM, Michael Knill <mic...@ip...> wrote:
>> 
>> Is there an easy way to tell what commit is in what release?
>> 
>> Regards
>> Michael Knill
> 
>    The github mirror of Asterisk shows which tags are included.
> 
>    Looking back from here (13.29.2):
>    https://github.com/asterisk/asterisk/commits/13.29/apps/app_queue.c
> 
>    to Sept 2018 where 13.23.1 is based, I see three app_queue.c "fix crash" commits.
> 
>    app_queue: Revert broken queue channel reference patch 
>    https://github.com/asterisk/asterisk/commit/91630834f784061ced7f01e55d8d6929d1350c8b#diff-a1ab912bb1327820884f2c5951760c74
> 
>    app_queue: Handle empty 'interface' in queue member config 
>    https://github.com/asterisk/asterisk/commit/cb6a97665671400b92e1c2da5944d59773521176#diff-a1ab912bb1327820884f2c5951760c74
> 
>    app_queue: fix ring_entry to access nativeformats with a channel lock 
>    https://github.com/asterisk/asterisk/commit/92d18898137036a44064f73b1e73312c835ab989#diff-a1ab912bb1327820884f2c5951760c74
> 
>    We could add these to 13se, or possibly this is a good time to bump 13se to 13.29.2 provided that was a generally stable Asterisk release.
> 
>    Lonnie

Michael

http://www.mksolutions.info