From: Michael K. <li...@mk...> - 2020-04-10 19:30:35
|
> Am 10.04.2020 um 21:15 schrieb Lonnie Abelbeck <li...@lo...>: > >> On Apr 9, 2020, at 3:52 PM, David Kerr <Da...@Ke...> wrote: >> >> I think you know my opinion... I'm always one that likes to keep up-to-date so I definitely support the move. I am not concerned about filesize increases, though it is definitely something to highlight and find out if other users care. I just don't know if this runs the risk of not working on very old h/w. >> >> ... > >> I have been testing a new crosstool-NG 1.24.0 version. >> >> I settled in on a good update: >> >> glibc 2.27, binutils 2.29.1, gcc 6.5.0 > > What are your thoughts on whether we should offer the toolchain as a binary download for a x86_64 host build environment ? If this would be easily possible, that would be great, cause it would simplify the initial build process a lot, and would save a lot of time. Maybe that move would attract more users to try to build own images in the future. > We can still show how to use crosstool-NG 1.24.0 and .config to generate the toolchain. > > I built the toolchain on a Debian 10.3 box, but it should run most anywhere given a glibc x86_64 host, correct ? I also think Debian 10 is a good choice. Either as small netinstall ISO or as template for hypervisors. I use an LXC container on Proxmox. > Lonnie Michael http://www.mksolutions.info |