Menu
▾
▴
astlinux-users — AstLinux Users Mailing List
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2006 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(20) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 |
Jan
(91) |
Feb
(111) |
Mar
(226) |
Apr
(65) |
May
(197) |
Jun
(202) |
Jul
(92) |
Aug
(87) |
Sep
(120) |
Oct
(133) |
Nov
(89) |
Dec
(155) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(251) |
Feb
(136) |
Mar
(174) |
Apr
(149) |
May
(56) |
Jun
(32) |
Jul
(36) |
Aug
(171) |
Sep
(245) |
Oct
(244) |
Nov
(218) |
Dec
(272) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(113) |
Feb
(119) |
Mar
(192) |
Apr
(117) |
May
(93) |
Jun
(46) |
Jul
(80) |
Aug
(54) |
Sep
(109) |
Oct
(70) |
Nov
(145) |
Dec
(110) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(137) |
Feb
(87) |
Mar
(45) |
Apr
(157) |
May
(58) |
Jun
(99) |
Jul
(188) |
Aug
(136) |
Sep
(101) |
Oct
(100) |
Nov
(61) |
Dec
(60) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(84) |
Feb
(43) |
Mar
(70) |
Apr
(17) |
May
(69) |
Jun
(28) |
Jul
(43) |
Aug
(21) |
Sep
(151) |
Oct
(120) |
Nov
(84) |
Dec
(101) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(119) |
Feb
(82) |
Mar
(70) |
Apr
(115) |
May
(66) |
Jun
(131) |
Jul
(70) |
Aug
(65) |
Sep
(66) |
Oct
(86) |
Nov
(197) |
Dec
(81) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(65) |
Feb
(48) |
Mar
(32) |
Apr
(68) |
May
(98) |
Jun
(59) |
Jul
(41) |
Aug
(52) |
Sep
(42) |
Oct
(37) |
Nov
(10) |
Dec
(27) |
| 2014 |
Jan
(61) |
Feb
(34) |
Mar
(30) |
Apr
(52) |
May
(45) |
Jun
(40) |
Jul
(28) |
Aug
(9) |
Sep
(39) |
Oct
(69) |
Nov
(55) |
Dec
(19) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(13) |
Feb
(21) |
Mar
(5) |
Apr
(14) |
May
(30) |
Jun
(51) |
Jul
(31) |
Aug
(12) |
Sep
(29) |
Oct
(15) |
Nov
(24) |
Dec
(16) |
| 2016 |
Jan
(62) |
Feb
(76) |
Mar
(30) |
Apr
(43) |
May
(46) |
Jun
(62) |
Jul
(21) |
Aug
(49) |
Sep
(67) |
Oct
(27) |
Nov
(26) |
Dec
(38) |
| 2017 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(12) |
Mar
(69) |
Apr
(59) |
May
(54) |
Jun
(40) |
Jul
(76) |
Aug
(82) |
Sep
(92) |
Oct
(51) |
Nov
(32) |
Dec
(30) |
| 2018 |
Jan
(22) |
Feb
(25) |
Mar
(34) |
Apr
(35) |
May
(37) |
Jun
(21) |
Jul
(69) |
Aug
(55) |
Sep
(17) |
Oct
(67) |
Nov
(9) |
Dec
(5) |
| 2019 |
Jan
(19) |
Feb
(12) |
Mar
(15) |
Apr
(19) |
May
|
Jun
(27) |
Jul
(27) |
Aug
(25) |
Sep
(25) |
Oct
(27) |
Nov
(10) |
Dec
(14) |
| 2020 |
Jan
(22) |
Feb
(20) |
Mar
(36) |
Apr
(40) |
May
(52) |
Jun
(35) |
Jul
(21) |
Aug
(32) |
Sep
(71) |
Oct
(27) |
Nov
(11) |
Dec
(16) |
| 2021 |
Jan
(16) |
Feb
(21) |
Mar
(21) |
Apr
(27) |
May
(17) |
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(22) |
Sep
(23) |
Oct
(7) |
Nov
(11) |
Dec
(28) |
| 2022 |
Jan
(23) |
Feb
(18) |
Mar
(9) |
Apr
(15) |
May
(15) |
Jun
(7) |
Jul
(8) |
Aug
(15) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
(11) |
Dec
(10) |
| 2023 |
Jan
(14) |
Feb
(10) |
Mar
(11) |
Apr
(13) |
May
(2) |
Jun
(30) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(15) |
Sep
(13) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
(25) |
Dec
(5) |
| 2024 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(10) |
Mar
(9) |
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
(15) |
Jul
(7) |
Aug
(10) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(8) |
Nov
(6) |
Dec
(15) |
| 2025 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(7) |
Apr
(5) |
May
(13) |
Jun
(16) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Michael K. <mic...@ip...> - 2022-06-25 01:22:09
|
Hi Group A couple of questions regarding Runnix: 1. I did a Runnix upgrade and it went to 0.6.11. Is this ok on Astlinux 1.3.10? 2. Can I upgrade to a specific Runnix version or is there no point? 3. Can I manage my own repository of Runnix? Thanks all. Regards Michael Knill Managing Director D: +61 2 6189 1360 P: +61 2 6140 4656 E: mic...@ip...<mailto:mic...@ip...> W: ipcsolutions.com.au<https://ipcsolutions.com.au/> [Icon Description automatically generated] Smarter Business Communications |
|
From: Lonnie A. <li...@lo...> - 2022-06-01 22:44:49
|
Announcing AstLinux Release: 1.4.6 More Info: AstLinux Project https://www.astlinux-project.org/ AstLinux 1.4.6 Highlights: * Asterisk Versions: 13.38.3, 16.25.3, 18.11.3 * Add support for UEFI boot in addition to the current Legacy BIOS boot * Linux Kernel 4.19.242, security and bug fixes * igc, backport from linux-5.4.191, Intel i225 2.5-Gigabit Ethernet Network Driver * r8125, version 9.009.00, Realtek RTL8125 2.5-Gigabit Ethernet Network Driver * RUNNIX, version bump to runnix-0.6.11 * OpenSSL, version bump to 1.1.1o, security fixes: CVE-2022-0778, CVE-2022-1292 * OpenVPN, version bump to 2.4.12, security fix: CVE-2022-0547 * libcurl (curl) version bump to 7.83.1, security fixes: many * LibreTLS, version bump to 3.5.2 * Monit, version bump to 5.32.0 * msmtp, version bump to 1.8.20 * php, version 7.2.34, add security fix: CVE-2021-21707 * smartctl (smartmontools), version bump to 7.3, drivedb.h snapshot 2022-05-10 * sqlite, version bump to 3.38.5, JSON support is now enabled * zabbix, version bump to 4.0.40 * Asterisk '13se' (stable edition) version 13.38.3 is the last Asterisk 13.x "Legacy" version, built --without-pjproject * Package upgrades providing important security and bug fixes Full ChangeLog: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/astlinux-project/astlinux/1.4.6/docs/ChangeLog.txt All users are encouraged to upgrade, read the ChangeLog for the details. AstLinux Team |
|
From: Michael K. <mic...@ip...> - 2022-05-16 22:37:38
|
We have lots of systems running in a KVM with no issues at all however the host is not managed by us so cant help with the setup I'm afraid.
Yes Vultr is the easiest to set up by far although in AU it hasn't been particularly stable from a network perspective. Linode is also pretty good.
Regards
Michael Knill
On 17/5/22, 6:41 am, "Lonnie Abelbeck" <li...@lo...> wrote:
Hi Hamid,
I know of a person who ran AstLinux VM ISO on bare-metal using QEMU/KVM ... it worked OK for him but took a lot of testing and internet searches to get it working. And keeping QEMU and all related packages up to date is very important. You will have to do your own testing and internet searches.
If your OVH VPS already runs on a hypervisor, running KVM on top of that is not ideal, and provided the VT-x/EPT CPU flags get passed through.
Did we mention Vultr starts at $5/month USD and you can deploy the latest AstLinux VM ISO in about 60 seconds. :-)
If you have a bare-metal server ESXi or Proxmox are good choices where the AstLinux VM ISO can be installed.
Lonnie
> On May 16, 2022, at 1:08 PM, Hamid Awad <m.h...@ms...> wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I can give you access to my virtualization enviroment so you can do anything you need and There’s vnc as well
>
> Regards,
>
>
> -------- Original message --------
> From: Michael Keuter <li...@mk...>
> Date: Mon, 16 May 2022, 19:00
> To: AstLinux Users Mailing List <ast...@li...>
> Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Can't access astlinux GUI
> We (AstLinux Team) documented only three Cloud scenarios, that we have tested ourselves.
> I cannot speak for installations on OVH. On Vultr it is quite easy to install.
>
> > Am 16.05.2022 um 18:37 schrieb Hamid Awad <m.h...@ms...>:
> >
> >
> > There’re talked about 3 cloud company.
> > Any way I read all the the docs in the link (https://doc.astlinux-project.org/userdoc:documentation#cloud_hosted_guest_vm_s
> > ) to understand the idea and applied it in my environment
> > I installed astlinux the remove the ISO CD and let astlinux boot from hd
> > No thing happens
> > Same issue
> > NOTE : I used Kimchi (Virtualization Management)
> > https://github.com/kimchi-project/wok @ ubuntu 16.04 server
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > From: Michael Keuter
> > Sent: Monday, May 16, 2022 12:59 PM
> > To: Hamid Awad
> > Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Can't access astlinux GUI
> >
> > https://doc.astlinux-project.org/userdoc:documentation#cloud_hosted_guest_vm_s
> >
> > > Am 16.05.2022 um 12:52 schrieb Hamid Awad <m.h...@ms...>:
> > >
> > > Hi again,
> > >
> > > In fact I managd dedicated server from ovh with virtualization (kvm)
> > >
> > > Can you tell me what can I do
> > >
> > > Regards
> > >
> > >
> > > -------- Original message --------
> > > From: Michael Keuter <li...@mk...>
> > > Date: Mon, 16 May 2022, 11:29
> > > To: AstLinux Users Mailing List <ast...@li...>
> > > Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Can't access astlinux GUI
> > > Hi Hamid,
> > >
> > > normally you should get a DHCP address from your provider.
> > > I had a same issue with another provider in Germany (static IP didn't help either), I filed a support request,
> > > and within a few hours they re-provisioned the server and I got an IP address via DHCP.
> > >
> > > Otherwise in "rc.conf":
> > >
> > > ----
> > > ## External Interface
> > > EXTIF="eth0"
> > >
> > > ## If EXTIP is set, a 'static' config is used instead of the default,
> > > ## which is DHCP client on $EXTIF. If you are using a T1/E1
> > > ## EXTGW is also the PtP address. You can enter as many DNS servers as
> > > ## you wish. They will be added in order.
> > > #EXTIP="192.168.25.2"
> > > #EXTNM="255.255.255.0"
> > > #EXTGW="192.168.25.1"
> > > #DNS="192.168.1.1 192.168.1.2 192.168.1.3"
> > > ----
> > >
> > > > Am 16.05.2022 um 08:48 schrieb Hamid Awad <m.h...@ms...>:
> > > >
> > > > VPS from ovh
> > > >
> > > > How can I turne dhcp off
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -------- Original message --------
> > > > From: Lonnie Abelbeck <li...@lo...>
> > > > Date: Mon, 16 May 2022, 04:03
> > > > To: AstLinux Users Mailing List <ast...@li...>
> > > > Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Can't access astlinux GUI
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > On May 15, 2022, at 3:44 PM, Hamid Awad <m.h...@ms...> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi every body,
> > > > > I install astlinux in my vps and all is fine, I could not assign IP address (my ip address)
> > > > > I tried ifconfig 54.x.x.x to setup ip and netmask and I successful on that.
> > > > > I can't ping the gateway so I can't add it to the route.
> > > >
> > > > What VPS are you trying to use?
> > > >
> > > > Doesn't DHCP (the default) work on the external interface?
> > > >
> > > > I know Vultr [1] can easily deploy an AstLinux VM ISO [2].
> > > >
> > > > Lonnie
> > > >
> > > > [1] https://www.vultr.com/
> > > >
> > > > [2] https://doc.astlinux-project.org/userdoc:hosted_guest_vm_vultr
> > >
> > > Michael
>
> Michael
>
> http://www.mksolutions.info
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Astlinux-users mailing list
> Ast...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users
>
> Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to pa...@kr....
> _______________________________________________
> Astlinux-users mailing list
> Ast...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users
>
> Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to pa...@kr....
_______________________________________________
Astlinux-users mailing list
Ast...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users
Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to pa...@kr....
|
|
From: Lonnie A. <li...@lo...> - 2022-05-16 20:40:25
|
Hi Hamid, I know of a person who ran AstLinux VM ISO on bare-metal using QEMU/KVM ... it worked OK for him but took a lot of testing and internet searches to get it working. And keeping QEMU and all related packages up to date is very important. You will have to do your own testing and internet searches. If your OVH VPS already runs on a hypervisor, running KVM on top of that is not ideal, and provided the VT-x/EPT CPU flags get passed through. Did we mention Vultr starts at $5/month USD and you can deploy the latest AstLinux VM ISO in about 60 seconds. :-) If you have a bare-metal server ESXi or Proxmox are good choices where the AstLinux VM ISO can be installed. Lonnie > On May 16, 2022, at 1:08 PM, Hamid Awad <m.h...@ms...> wrote: > > Hello, > I can give you access to my virtualization enviroment so you can do anything you need and There’s vnc as well > > Regards, > > > -------- Original message -------- > From: Michael Keuter <li...@mk...> > Date: Mon, 16 May 2022, 19:00 > To: AstLinux Users Mailing List <ast...@li...> > Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Can't access astlinux GUI > We (AstLinux Team) documented only three Cloud scenarios, that we have tested ourselves. > I cannot speak for installations on OVH. On Vultr it is quite easy to install. > > > Am 16.05.2022 um 18:37 schrieb Hamid Awad <m.h...@ms...>: > > > > > > There’re talked about 3 cloud company. > > Any way I read all the the docs in the link (https://doc.astlinux-project.org/userdoc:documentation#cloud_hosted_guest_vm_s > > ) to understand the idea and applied it in my environment > > I installed astlinux the remove the ISO CD and let astlinux boot from hd > > No thing happens > > Same issue > > NOTE : I used Kimchi (Virtualization Management) > > https://github.com/kimchi-project/wok @ ubuntu 16.04 server > > > > Regards, > > > > From: Michael Keuter > > Sent: Monday, May 16, 2022 12:59 PM > > To: Hamid Awad > > Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Can't access astlinux GUI > > > > https://doc.astlinux-project.org/userdoc:documentation#cloud_hosted_guest_vm_s > > > > > Am 16.05.2022 um 12:52 schrieb Hamid Awad <m.h...@ms...>: > > > > > > Hi again, > > > > > > In fact I managd dedicated server from ovh with virtualization (kvm) > > > > > > Can you tell me what can I do > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > > > > -------- Original message -------- > > > From: Michael Keuter <li...@mk...> > > > Date: Mon, 16 May 2022, 11:29 > > > To: AstLinux Users Mailing List <ast...@li...> > > > Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Can't access astlinux GUI > > > Hi Hamid, > > > > > > normally you should get a DHCP address from your provider. > > > I had a same issue with another provider in Germany (static IP didn't help either), I filed a support request, > > > and within a few hours they re-provisioned the server and I got an IP address via DHCP. > > > > > > Otherwise in "rc.conf": > > > > > > ---- > > > ## External Interface > > > EXTIF="eth0" > > > > > > ## If EXTIP is set, a 'static' config is used instead of the default, > > > ## which is DHCP client on $EXTIF. If you are using a T1/E1 > > > ## EXTGW is also the PtP address. You can enter as many DNS servers as > > > ## you wish. They will be added in order. > > > #EXTIP="192.168.25.2" > > > #EXTNM="255.255.255.0" > > > #EXTGW="192.168.25.1" > > > #DNS="192.168.1.1 192.168.1.2 192.168.1.3" > > > ---- > > > > > > > Am 16.05.2022 um 08:48 schrieb Hamid Awad <m.h...@ms...>: > > > > > > > > VPS from ovh > > > > > > > > How can I turne dhcp off > > > > > > > > > > > > -------- Original message -------- > > > > From: Lonnie Abelbeck <li...@lo...> > > > > Date: Mon, 16 May 2022, 04:03 > > > > To: AstLinux Users Mailing List <ast...@li...> > > > > Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Can't access astlinux GUI > > > > > > > > > > > > > On May 15, 2022, at 3:44 PM, Hamid Awad <m.h...@ms...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hi every body, > > > > > I install astlinux in my vps and all is fine, I could not assign IP address (my ip address) > > > > > I tried ifconfig 54.x.x.x to setup ip and netmask and I successful on that. > > > > > I can't ping the gateway so I can't add it to the route. > > > > > > > > What VPS are you trying to use? > > > > > > > > Doesn't DHCP (the default) work on the external interface? > > > > > > > > I know Vultr [1] can easily deploy an AstLinux VM ISO [2]. > > > > > > > > Lonnie > > > > > > > > [1] https://www.vultr.com/ > > > > > > > > [2] https://doc.astlinux-project.org/userdoc:hosted_guest_vm_vultr > > > > > > Michael > > Michael > > http://www.mksolutions.info > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Astlinux-users mailing list > Ast...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users > > Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to pa...@kr.... > _______________________________________________ > Astlinux-users mailing list > Ast...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users > > Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to pa...@kr.... |
|
From: Hamid A. <m.h...@ms...> - 2022-05-16 18:44:35
|
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><div dir="auto">Hello,<div>I can give you access to my virtualization enviroment so you can do anything you need and There’s vnc as well </div><div><br></div><div>Regards, </div></div><div style="line-height:1.5"><br><br>-------- Original message --------<br>From: Michael Keuter <li...@mk...><br>Date: Mon, 16 May 2022, 19:00<br>To: AstLinux Users Mailing List <ast...@li...><br>Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Can't access astlinux GUI<br><blockquote>We (AstLinux Team) documented only three Cloud scenarios, that we have tested ourselves.<br>I cannot speak for installations on OVH. On Vultr it is quite easy to install.<br><br>> Am 16.05.2022 um 18:37 schrieb Hamid Awad <m.h...@ms...>:<br>> <br>> <br>> There’re talked about 3 cloud company.<br>> Any way I read all the the docs in the link (https://doc.astlinux-project.org/userdoc:documentation#cloud_hosted_guest_vm_s<br>> ) to understand the idea and applied it in my environment<br>> I installed astlinux the remove the ISO CD and let astlinux boot from hd<br>> No thing happens<br>> Same issue<br>> NOTE : I used Kimchi (Virtualization Management)<br>> https://github.com/kimchi-project/wok @ ubuntu 16.04 server<br>> <br>> Regards,<br>> <br>> From: Michael Keuter<br>> Sent: Monday, May 16, 2022 12:59 PM<br>> To: Hamid Awad<br>> Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Can't access astlinux GUI<br>> <br>> https://doc.astlinux-project.org/userdoc:documentation#cloud_hosted_guest_vm_s<br>> <br>> > Am 16.05.2022 um 12:52 schrieb Hamid Awad <m.h...@ms...>:<br>> ><br>> > Hi again,<br>> ><br>> > In fact I managd dedicated server from ovh with virtualization (kvm)<br>> ><br>> > Can you tell me what can I do<br>> ><br>> > Regards<br>> ><br>> ><br>> > -------- Original message --------<br>> > From: Michael Keuter <li...@mk...><br>> > Date: Mon, 16 May 2022, 11:29<br>> > To: AstLinux Users Mailing List <ast...@li...><br>> > Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Can't access astlinux GUI<br>> > Hi Hamid,<br>> ><br>> > normally you should get a DHCP address from your provider.<br>> > I had a same issue with another provider in Germany (static IP didn't help either), I filed a support request,<br>> > and within a few hours they re-provisioned the server and I got an IP address via DHCP.<br>> ><br>> > Otherwise in "rc.conf":<br>> ><br>> > ----<br>> > ## External Interface<br>> > EXTIF="eth0"<br>> ><br>> > ## If EXTIP is set, a 'static' config is used instead of the default,<br>> > ## which is DHCP client on $EXTIF. If you are using a T1/E1<br>> > ## EXTGW is also the PtP address. You can enter as many DNS servers as<br>> > ## you wish. They will be added in order.<br>> > #EXTIP="192.168.25.2"<br>> > #EXTNM="255.255.255.0"<br>> > #EXTGW="192.168.25.1"<br>> > #DNS="192.168.1.1 192.168.1.2 192.168.1.3"<br>> > ----<br>> ><br>> > > Am 16.05.2022 um 08:48 schrieb Hamid Awad <m.h...@ms...>:<br>> > ><br>> > > VPS from ovh<br>> > ><br>> > > How can I turne dhcp off<br>> > ><br>> > ><br>> > > -------- Original message --------<br>> > > From: Lonnie Abelbeck <li...@lo...><br>> > > Date: Mon, 16 May 2022, 04:03<br>> > > To: AstLinux Users Mailing List <ast...@li...><br>> > > Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Can't access astlinux GUI<br>> > ><br>> > ><br>> > > > On May 15, 2022, at 3:44 PM, Hamid Awad <m.h...@ms...> wrote:<br>> > > ><br>> > > > Hi every body,<br>> > > > I install astlinux in my vps and all is fine, I could not assign IP address (my ip address)<br>> > > > I tried ifconfig 54.x.x.x to setup ip and netmask and I successful on that.<br>> > > > I can't ping the gateway so I can't add it to the route.<br>> > ><br>> > > What VPS are you trying to use?<br>> > ><br>> > > Doesn't DHCP (the default) work on the external interface?<br>> > ><br>> > > I know Vultr [1] can easily deploy an AstLinux VM ISO [2].<br>> > ><br>> > > Lonnie<br>> > ><br>> > > [1] https://www.vultr.com/<br>> > ><br>> > > [2] https://doc.astlinux-project.org/userdoc:hosted_guest_vm_vultr<br>> ><br>> > Michael<br><br>Michael<br><br>http://www.mksolutions.info<br><br><br><br><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>Astlinux-users mailing list<br>Ast...@li...<br>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users<br><br>Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to pa...@kr....</blockquote></div> |
|
From: Michael K. <li...@mk...> - 2022-05-16 16:59:35
|
We (AstLinux Team) documented only three Cloud scenarios, that we have tested ourselves. I cannot speak for installations on OVH. On Vultr it is quite easy to install. > Am 16.05.2022 um 18:37 schrieb Hamid Awad <m.h...@ms...>: > > > There’re talked about 3 cloud company. > Any way I read all the the docs in the link (https://doc.astlinux-project.org/userdoc:documentation#cloud_hosted_guest_vm_s > ) to understand the idea and applied it in my environment > I installed astlinux the remove the ISO CD and let astlinux boot from hd > No thing happens > Same issue > NOTE : I used Kimchi (Virtualization Management) > https://github.com/kimchi-project/wok @ ubuntu 16.04 server > > Regards, > > From: Michael Keuter > Sent: Monday, May 16, 2022 12:59 PM > To: Hamid Awad > Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Can't access astlinux GUI > > https://doc.astlinux-project.org/userdoc:documentation#cloud_hosted_guest_vm_s > > > Am 16.05.2022 um 12:52 schrieb Hamid Awad <m.h...@ms...>: > > > > Hi again, > > > > In fact I managd dedicated server from ovh with virtualization (kvm) > > > > Can you tell me what can I do > > > > Regards > > > > > > -------- Original message -------- > > From: Michael Keuter <li...@mk...> > > Date: Mon, 16 May 2022, 11:29 > > To: AstLinux Users Mailing List <ast...@li...> > > Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Can't access astlinux GUI > > Hi Hamid, > > > > normally you should get a DHCP address from your provider. > > I had a same issue with another provider in Germany (static IP didn't help either), I filed a support request, > > and within a few hours they re-provisioned the server and I got an IP address via DHCP. > > > > Otherwise in "rc.conf": > > > > ---- > > ## External Interface > > EXTIF="eth0" > > > > ## If EXTIP is set, a 'static' config is used instead of the default, > > ## which is DHCP client on $EXTIF. If you are using a T1/E1 > > ## EXTGW is also the PtP address. You can enter as many DNS servers as > > ## you wish. They will be added in order. > > #EXTIP="192.168.25.2" > > #EXTNM="255.255.255.0" > > #EXTGW="192.168.25.1" > > #DNS="192.168.1.1 192.168.1.2 192.168.1.3" > > ---- > > > > > Am 16.05.2022 um 08:48 schrieb Hamid Awad <m.h...@ms...>: > > > > > > VPS from ovh > > > > > > How can I turne dhcp off > > > > > > > > > -------- Original message -------- > > > From: Lonnie Abelbeck <li...@lo...> > > > Date: Mon, 16 May 2022, 04:03 > > > To: AstLinux Users Mailing List <ast...@li...> > > > Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Can't access astlinux GUI > > > > > > > > > > On May 15, 2022, at 3:44 PM, Hamid Awad <m.h...@ms...> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi every body, > > > > I install astlinux in my vps and all is fine, I could not assign IP address (my ip address) > > > > I tried ifconfig 54.x.x.x to setup ip and netmask and I successful on that. > > > > I can't ping the gateway so I can't add it to the route. > > > > > > What VPS are you trying to use? > > > > > > Doesn't DHCP (the default) work on the external interface? > > > > > > I know Vultr [1] can easily deploy an AstLinux VM ISO [2]. > > > > > > Lonnie > > > > > > [1] https://www.vultr.com/ > > > > > > [2] https://doc.astlinux-project.org/userdoc:hosted_guest_vm_vultr > > > > Michael Michael http://www.mksolutions.info |
|
From: Hamid A. <m.h...@ms...> - 2022-05-16 10:53:00
|
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><div dir="auto">Hi again,<div><br></div><div>In fact I managd dedicated server from ovh with virtualization (kvm)</div><div><br></div><div>Can you tell me what can I do</div><div><br></div><div>Regards </div></div><div style="line-height:1.5"><br><br>-------- Original message --------<br>From: Michael Keuter <li...@mk...><br>Date: Mon, 16 May 2022, 11:29<br>To: AstLinux Users Mailing List <ast...@li...><br>Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Can't access astlinux GUI<br><blockquote>Hi Hamid,<br><br>normally you should get a DHCP address from your provider.<br>I had a same issue with another provider in Germany (static IP didn't help either), I filed a support request, <br>and within a few hours they re-provisioned the server and I got an IP address via DHCP.<br><br>Otherwise in "rc.conf":<br><br>----<br>## External Interface<br>EXTIF="eth0"<br><br>## If EXTIP is set, a 'static' config is used instead of the default,<br>## which is DHCP client on $EXTIF. If you are using a T1/E1<br>## EXTGW is also the PtP address. You can enter as many DNS servers as<br>## you wish. They will be added in order.<br>#EXTIP="192.168.25.2"<br>#EXTNM="255.255.255.0"<br>#EXTGW="192.168.25.1"<br>#DNS="192.168.1.1 192.168.1.2 192.168.1.3"<br>----<br><br>> Am 16.05.2022 um 08:48 schrieb Hamid Awad <m.h...@ms...>:<br>> <br>> VPS from ovh<br>> <br>> How can I turne dhcp off<br>> <br>> <br>> -------- Original message --------<br>> From: Lonnie Abelbeck <li...@lo...><br>> Date: Mon, 16 May 2022, 04:03<br>> To: AstLinux Users Mailing List <ast...@li...><br>> Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Can't access astlinux GUI<br>> <br>> <br>> > On May 15, 2022, at 3:44 PM, Hamid Awad <m.h...@ms...> wrote:<br>> > <br>> > Hi every body, <br>> > I install astlinux in my vps and all is fine, I could not assign IP address (my ip address)<br>> > I tried ifconfig 54.x.x.x to setup ip and netmask and I successful on that. <br>> > I can't ping the gateway so I can't add it to the route. <br>> <br>> What VPS are you trying to use?<br>> <br>> Doesn't DHCP (the default) work on the external interface?<br>> <br>> I know Vultr [1] can easily deploy an AstLinux VM ISO [2].<br>> <br>> Lonnie<br>> <br>> [1] https://www.vultr.com/<br>> <br>> [2] https://doc.astlinux-project.org/userdoc:hosted_guest_vm_vultr<br><br>Michael<br><br>http://www.mksolutions.info<br><br><br><br><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>Astlinux-users mailing list<br>Ast...@li...<br>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users<br><br>Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to pa...@kr....<br></blockquote></div> |
|
From: Michael K. <li...@mk...> - 2022-05-16 09:29:10
|
Hi Hamid, normally you should get a DHCP address from your provider. I had a same issue with another provider in Germany (static IP didn't help either), I filed a support request, and within a few hours they re-provisioned the server and I got an IP address via DHCP. Otherwise in "rc.conf": ---- ## External Interface EXTIF="eth0" ## If EXTIP is set, a 'static' config is used instead of the default, ## which is DHCP client on $EXTIF. If you are using a T1/E1 ## EXTGW is also the PtP address. You can enter as many DNS servers as ## you wish. They will be added in order. #EXTIP="192.168.25.2" #EXTNM="255.255.255.0" #EXTGW="192.168.25.1" #DNS="192.168.1.1 192.168.1.2 192.168.1.3" ---- > Am 16.05.2022 um 08:48 schrieb Hamid Awad <m.h...@ms...>: > > VPS from ovh > > How can I turne dhcp off > > > -------- Original message -------- > From: Lonnie Abelbeck <li...@lo...> > Date: Mon, 16 May 2022, 04:03 > To: AstLinux Users Mailing List <ast...@li...> > Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Can't access astlinux GUI > > > > On May 15, 2022, at 3:44 PM, Hamid Awad <m.h...@ms...> wrote: > > > > Hi every body, > > I install astlinux in my vps and all is fine, I could not assign IP address (my ip address) > > I tried ifconfig 54.x.x.x to setup ip and netmask and I successful on that. > > I can't ping the gateway so I can't add it to the route. > > What VPS are you trying to use? > > Doesn't DHCP (the default) work on the external interface? > > I know Vultr [1] can easily deploy an AstLinux VM ISO [2]. > > Lonnie > > [1] https://www.vultr.com/ > > [2] https://doc.astlinux-project.org/userdoc:hosted_guest_vm_vultr Michael http://www.mksolutions.info |
|
From: Hamid A. <m.h...@ms...> - 2022-05-16 06:48:57
|
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><div dir="auto"><div id="hw_signature">VPS from ovh</div><div id="hw_signature"><br></div><div id="hw_signature">How can I turne dhcp off</div></div><div style="line-height:1.5"><br><br>-------- Original message --------<br>From: Lonnie Abelbeck <li...@lo...><br>Date: Mon, 16 May 2022, 04:03<br>To: AstLinux Users Mailing List <ast...@li...><br>Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Can't access astlinux GUI<br><blockquote><br><br>> On May 15, 2022, at 3:44 PM, Hamid Awad <m.h...@ms...> wrote:<br>> <br>> Hi every body, <br>> I install astlinux in my vps and all is fine, I could not assign IP address (my ip address)<br>> I tried ifconfig 54.x.x.x to setup ip and netmask and I successful on that. <br>> I can't ping the gateway so I can't add it to the route. <br><br>What VPS are you trying to use?<br><br>Doesn't DHCP (the default) work on the external interface?<br><br>I know Vultr [1] can easily deploy an AstLinux VM ISO [2].<br><br>Lonnie<br><br>[1] https://www.vultr.com/<br><br>[2] https://doc.astlinux-project.org/userdoc:hosted_guest_vm_vultr<br><br>_______________________________________________<br>Astlinux-users mailing list<br>Ast...@li...<br>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users<br><br>Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to pa...@kr....<br></blockquote></div> |
|
From: Lonnie A. <li...@lo...> - 2022-05-16 02:03:33
|
> On May 15, 2022, at 3:44 PM, Hamid Awad <m.h...@ms...> wrote: > > Hi every body, > I install astlinux in my vps and all is fine, I could not assign IP address (my ip address) > I tried ifconfig 54.x.x.x to setup ip and netmask and I successful on that. > I can't ping the gateway so I can't add it to the route. What VPS are you trying to use? Doesn't DHCP (the default) work on the external interface? I know Vultr [1] can easily deploy an AstLinux VM ISO [2]. Lonnie [1] https://www.vultr.com/ [2] https://doc.astlinux-project.org/userdoc:hosted_guest_vm_vultr |
|
From: Hamid A. <m.h...@ms...> - 2022-05-16 01:17:06
|
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><div dir="auto"><div><div>Hi every body, <br>I install astlinux in my vps and all is fine, I could not assign IP address (my ip address)<br>I tried ifconfig 54.x.x.x to setup ip and netmask and I successful on that. <br>I can't ping the gateway so I can't add it to the route. <br><br>I also tried to create /mnt/kd/rc.conf but I failed here<br><br>I also stopped dnsmasq but am not what's the next step. <br><br>Please help me <br><br>Regards <br><br><br></div></div></div> |
|
From: Lonnie A. <li...@lo...> - 2022-05-15 23:00:23
|
Announcing AstLinux Pre-Release: astlinux-1.4-5492-970ef8 Key new features: -- Add support for UEFI boot in addition to the current Legacy BIOS boot. More info: https://doc.astlinux-project.org/userdoc:boot-bios-uefi ** The AstLinux Team is regularly upgrading packages containing security and bug fixes as well as adding new features of our own. -- Linux Kernel 4.19.242 (version bump), security and bug fixes -- RUNNIX, version bump to runnix-0.6.11, with Linux Kernel 4.19.242, add UEFI boot support as well as Legacy BIOS boot. == syslinux, version 6.03, enable EFI (64-bit) support == gnu-efi, new package, version 3.0.10 -- igc, backport from linux-5.4.191, Intel i225 2.5-Gigabit Ethernet Network Driver -- r8125, version 9.009.00, Realtek RTL8125 2.5-Gigabit Ethernet Network Driver -- igb, version bump to 5.10.2, Intel 1.0-Gigabit Ethernet Network Driver -- OpenSSL, version bump to 1.1.1o, security fixes: CVE-2022-0778, CVE-2022-1292 -- OpenVPN, version bump to 2.4.12, security fix: CVE-2022-0547 -- WireGuard VPN, module 1.0.20211208 (no change), tools 1.0.20210914 (no change) -- libcurl (curl) version bump to 7.83.1, many security fixes -- Monit, version bump to 5.32.0 -- php, version 7.2.34, add security fix: CVE-2021-21707 -- smartctl (smartmontools), version bump to 7.3, drivedb.h snapshot 2022-05-10 -- sqlite, version bump to 3.38.5, JSON support is now enabled -- zabbix, version bump to 4.0.40 -- lighttpd/php, anonymize header version information -- Asterisk 13.38.3 ('13se' no change) Last Asterisk 13.x "Legacy" version, built --without-pjproject -- Asterisk 16.25.3 (version bump) and 18.11.3 (version bump) Security fixes: (res_stir_shaken) CVE-2022-26498, CVE-2022-26499 -- pjsip 2.10, security fixes: CVE-2022-21723, CVE-2022-23608, CVE-2021-37706 -- Complete Pre-Release ChangeLog: https://astlinux-project.org/beta/astlinux-changelog/ChangeLog.txt The "AstLinux Pre-Release ChangeLog" and "Pre-Release Repository URL" entries can be found under the "Development" tab of the AstLinux Project web site ... AstLinux Project -> Development https://www.astlinux-project.org/dev.html AstLinux Team |
|
From: Lonnie A. <li...@lo...> - 2022-05-15 22:07:15
|
I don't think adding a dummy endpoint would be a good idea. If seeing logs is the problem, removing "warning" from asterisk/logger.conf on that box might work, not sure what important things you might miss. If you built your own AstLinux images, you could patch out that line in Asterisk. Lonnie > On May 15, 2022, at 4:45 PM, Michael Knill <mic...@ip...> wrote: > > Ah thanks Lonnie. Yes this is when I'm using one-way peers. Problem is that yes Asterisk does bail quickly but then complains about it in the logs. > Two-way endpoints are out of the question unfortunately. Do you think there is any way to fool it e.g. add a dummy endpoint or would this break stuff or be very inefficient? > I'm thinking to reduce the problem I will only use VPN when I need to e.g. when behind NAT, failover, dynamic address etc. and use direct trunk all other times. > > Regards > Michael Knill > > On 15/5/22, 11:34 pm, "Lonnie Abelbeck" <li...@lo...> wrote: > > Hi Michael, > > That is what WireGuard does if there is no "Endpoint" and the peer route is down. > > Simple examples ... > > Example #1 > -- wg.conf snip (no Endpoint) -- > [Peer] > ## hpe-ms|pbx-pve > PublicKey = ... > AllowedIPs = 10.4.0.15/32 > -- > > # fping 10.4.0.15 > 10.4.0.15: error while sending ping: Destination address required > 10.4.0.15 is unreachable > > Note: fping returns immediately > > Example #2 > -- wg.conf snip (with Endpoint) -- > [Peer] > ## hpe-ms|pbx-pve > PublicKey = ... > Endpoint = 10.10.10.15:51820 > AllowedIPs = 10.4.0.15/32 > -- > > # fping 10.4.0.15 > 10.4.0.15 is unreachable > > Note: fping returns after a few seconds of trying > > So, if you have one-way established WireGuard peers, this is working as efficiently as possible. This allows Asterisk to bail quickly. > > Alternatively if you have two-way established WireGuard peers, each end's peer can contain a "Endpoint" which will try to establish the tunnel and only return "unreachable" if it can't. > > Lonnie > > >> On May 14, 2022, at 10:07 PM, Michael Knill <mic...@ip...> wrote: >> >> I use Wireguard VPN’s extensively and our softswitch has many peers connected to it. >> One issue that is very annoying is that if a VPN route drops out of the routing table, rather than just Unreachable, Asterisk complains as below: >> [May 14 07:20:37] WARNING[2082]: chan_sip.c:3781 __sip_xmit: sip_xmit of 0x2b61f424e7a0 (len 509) to 172.29.1.252:5060 returned -1: Destination address required >> [May 14 07:20:38] WARNING[2082]: chan_sip.c:3781 __sip_xmit: sip_xmit of 0x2b61f458c940 (len 507) to 172.29.1.13:5060 returned -1: Destination address required >> You also get the same when you try to ping it. >> >> Can you think of any way to resolve this. I tried a null route and that didn't work. >> >> Regards >> >> Michael Knill >> Managing Director >> >> D: +61 2 6189 1360 >> P: +61 2 6140 4656 >> E: mic...@ip... >> W: ipcsolutions.com.au >> >> <image001.png> >> Smarter Business Communications >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Astlinux-users mailing list >> Ast...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users >> >> Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to pa...@kr.... > > > > _______________________________________________ > Astlinux-users mailing list > Ast...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users > > Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to pa...@kr.... > > > _______________________________________________ > Astlinux-users mailing list > Ast...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users > > Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to pa...@kr.... |
|
From: Michael K. <mic...@ip...> - 2022-05-15 21:46:04
|
Ah thanks Lonnie. Yes this is when I'm using one-way peers. Problem is that yes Asterisk does bail quickly but then complains about it in the logs.
Two-way endpoints are out of the question unfortunately. Do you think there is any way to fool it e.g. add a dummy endpoint or would this break stuff or be very inefficient?
I'm thinking to reduce the problem I will only use VPN when I need to e.g. when behind NAT, failover, dynamic address etc. and use direct trunk all other times.
Regards
Michael Knill
On 15/5/22, 11:34 pm, "Lonnie Abelbeck" <li...@lo...> wrote:
Hi Michael,
That is what WireGuard does if there is no "Endpoint" and the peer route is down.
Simple examples ...
Example #1
-- wg.conf snip (no Endpoint) --
[Peer]
## hpe-ms|pbx-pve
PublicKey = ...
AllowedIPs = 10.4.0.15/32
--
# fping 10.4.0.15
10.4.0.15: error while sending ping: Destination address required
10.4.0.15 is unreachable
Note: fping returns immediately
Example #2
-- wg.conf snip (with Endpoint) --
[Peer]
## hpe-ms|pbx-pve
PublicKey = ...
Endpoint = 10.10.10.15:51820
AllowedIPs = 10.4.0.15/32
--
# fping 10.4.0.15
10.4.0.15 is unreachable
Note: fping returns after a few seconds of trying
So, if you have one-way established WireGuard peers, this is working as efficiently as possible. This allows Asterisk to bail quickly.
Alternatively if you have two-way established WireGuard peers, each end's peer can contain a "Endpoint" which will try to establish the tunnel and only return "unreachable" if it can't.
Lonnie
> On May 14, 2022, at 10:07 PM, Michael Knill <mic...@ip...> wrote:
>
> I use Wireguard VPN’s extensively and our softswitch has many peers connected to it.
> One issue that is very annoying is that if a VPN route drops out of the routing table, rather than just Unreachable, Asterisk complains as below:
> [May 14 07:20:37] WARNING[2082]: chan_sip.c:3781 __sip_xmit: sip_xmit of 0x2b61f424e7a0 (len 509) to 172.29.1.252:5060 returned -1: Destination address required
> [May 14 07:20:38] WARNING[2082]: chan_sip.c:3781 __sip_xmit: sip_xmit of 0x2b61f458c940 (len 507) to 172.29.1.13:5060 returned -1: Destination address required
> You also get the same when you try to ping it.
>
> Can you think of any way to resolve this. I tried a null route and that didn't work.
>
> Regards
>
> Michael Knill
> Managing Director
>
> D: +61 2 6189 1360
> P: +61 2 6140 4656
> E: mic...@ip...
> W: ipcsolutions.com.au
>
> <image001.png>
> Smarter Business Communications
>
> _______________________________________________
> Astlinux-users mailing list
> Ast...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users
>
> Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to pa...@kr....
_______________________________________________
Astlinux-users mailing list
Ast...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users
Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to pa...@kr....
|
|
From: Lonnie A. <li...@lo...> - 2022-05-15 13:34:10
|
Hi Michael, That is what WireGuard does if there is no "Endpoint" and the peer route is down. Simple examples ... Example #1 -- wg.conf snip (no Endpoint) -- [Peer] ## hpe-ms|pbx-pve PublicKey = ... AllowedIPs = 10.4.0.15/32 -- # fping 10.4.0.15 10.4.0.15: error while sending ping: Destination address required 10.4.0.15 is unreachable Note: fping returns immediately Example #2 -- wg.conf snip (with Endpoint) -- [Peer] ## hpe-ms|pbx-pve PublicKey = ... Endpoint = 10.10.10.15:51820 AllowedIPs = 10.4.0.15/32 -- # fping 10.4.0.15 10.4.0.15 is unreachable Note: fping returns after a few seconds of trying So, if you have one-way established WireGuard peers, this is working as efficiently as possible. This allows Asterisk to bail quickly. Alternatively if you have two-way established WireGuard peers, each end's peer can contain a "Endpoint" which will try to establish the tunnel and only return "unreachable" if it can't. Lonnie > On May 14, 2022, at 10:07 PM, Michael Knill <mic...@ip...> wrote: > > I use Wireguard VPN’s extensively and our softswitch has many peers connected to it. > One issue that is very annoying is that if a VPN route drops out of the routing table, rather than just Unreachable, Asterisk complains as below: > [May 14 07:20:37] WARNING[2082]: chan_sip.c:3781 __sip_xmit: sip_xmit of 0x2b61f424e7a0 (len 509) to 172.29.1.252:5060 returned -1: Destination address required > [May 14 07:20:38] WARNING[2082]: chan_sip.c:3781 __sip_xmit: sip_xmit of 0x2b61f458c940 (len 507) to 172.29.1.13:5060 returned -1: Destination address required > You also get the same when you try to ping it. > > Can you think of any way to resolve this. I tried a null route and that didn't work. > > Regards > > Michael Knill > Managing Director > > D: +61 2 6189 1360 > P: +61 2 6140 4656 > E: mic...@ip... > W: ipcsolutions.com.au > > <image001.png> > Smarter Business Communications > > _______________________________________________ > Astlinux-users mailing list > Ast...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users > > Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to pa...@kr.... |
|
From: Michael K. <li...@mk...> - 2022-05-15 08:47:10
|
> Am 15.05.2022 um 05:07 schrieb Michael Knill <mic...@ip...>: > > I use Wireguard VPN’s extensively and our softswitch has many peers connected to it. > One issue that is very annoying is that if a VPN route drops out of the routing table, rather than just Unreachable, Asterisk complains as below: > [May 14 07:20:37] WARNING[2082]: chan_sip.c:3781 __sip_xmit: sip_xmit of 0x2b61f424e7a0 (len 509) to 172.29.1.252:5060 returned -1: Destination address required > [May 14 07:20:38] WARNING[2082]: chan_sip.c:3781 __sip_xmit: sip_xmit of 0x2b61f458c940 (len 507) to 172.29.1.13:5060 returned -1: Destination address required > You also get the same when you try to ping it. > > Can you think of any way to resolve this. I tried a null route and that didn't work. > > Regards > > Michael Knill > Managing Director Hi Michael, have you tried "qualify=yes" versus "no" for the client in "sip.conf", sometimes this makes a difference. Michael http://www.mksolutions.info |
|
From: Michael K. <mic...@ip...> - 2022-05-15 03:07:57
|
I use Wireguard VPN’s extensively and our softswitch has many peers connected to it. One issue that is very annoying is that if a VPN route drops out of the routing table, rather than just Unreachable, Asterisk complains as below: [May 14 07:20:37] WARNING[2082]: chan_sip.c:3781 __sip_xmit: sip_xmit of 0x2b61f424e7a0 (len 509) to 172.29.1.252:5060 returned -1: Destination address required [May 14 07:20:38] WARNING[2082]: chan_sip.c:3781 __sip_xmit: sip_xmit of 0x2b61f458c940 (len 507) to 172.29.1.13:5060 returned -1: Destination address required You also get the same when you try to ping it. Can you think of any way to resolve this. I tried a null route and that didn't work. Regards Michael Knill Managing Director D: +61 2 6189 1360 P: +61 2 6140 4656 E: mic...@ip...<mailto:mic...@ip...> W: ipcsolutions.com.au<https://ipcsolutions.com.au/> [Icon Description automatically generated] Smarter Business Communications |
|
From: Lonnie A. <li...@lo...> - 2022-04-28 22:18:18
|
A newly released hardware description and configuration has been added to the AstLinux documentation: Qotom Q750G5 Celeron J4125 Fanless Appliance https://doc.astlinux-project.org/userdoc:board_qotom_q750g5 Michael Keuter personally purchased a Qotom Q750G5 J4125 No-WiFi via AliExpress. https://www.aliexpress.com/item/1005003792068209.html The Qotom Q750G5 J4125 offers: -- Small fanless case -- Intel Celeron CPU J4125 (4x) @ 2.00GHz (burst to 2.70 GHz enabled) -- Legacy BIOS or UEFI boot support (AMI) -- 5x Intel i225-V NICs (2.5Gbps) -- Supports mSATA SSD -- Supports Video (HDMI) Console (Serial header on board) -- Piezo speaker -- Power button Note: The J4125 version is currently sold out, a J4105 version is available for about $10 USD less. Intel Celeron CPU J4105 (4x) @ 1.50GHz (burst to 2.50 GHz enabled) Thanks to Michael for being an early adopter and purchasing this box. I'm sure Michael will answer any questions. Lonnie |
|
From: Lonnie A. <li...@lo...> - 2022-04-28 21:46:00
|
Announcing AstLinux Pre-Release: astlinux-1.4-5459-c657da Key new features: -- Add support for UEFI boot in addition to the current Legacy BIOS boot. More info: https://doc.astlinux-project.org/userdoc:boot-bios-uefi ** The AstLinux Team is regularly upgrading packages containing security and bug fixes as well as adding new features of our own. -- Linux Kernel 4.19.236 (version bump), security and bug fixes -- RUNNIX, version bump to runnix-0.6.10, with Linux Kernel 4.19.236, add UEFI boot support as well as Legacy BIOS boot. == syslinux, version 6.03, enable EFI (64-bit) support == gnu-efi, new package, version 3.0.10 -- igc, backport from linux-5.4.191, Intel i225 2.5-Gigabit Ethernet Network Driver -- r8125, version 9.008.00, Realtek RTL8125 2.5-Gigabit Ethernet Network Driver -- OpenSSL, version bump to 1.1.1n, security fix: CVE-2022-0778 -- OpenVPN, version bump to 2.4.12, security fix: CVE-2022-0547 -- WireGuard VPN, module 1.0.20211208 (no change), tools 1.0.20210914 (no change) -- libcurl (curl) version bump to 7.82.0 -- Monit, version bump to 5.32.0 -- php, version 7.2.34, add security fix: CVE-2021-21707 -- sqlite, version bump to 3.38.2, JSON support is now enabled -- lighttpd/php, anonymize header version information -- Asterisk 13.38.3 ('13se' no change) Last Asterisk 13.x "Legacy" version, built --without-pjproject -- Asterisk 16.25.3 (version bump) and 18.11.3 (version bump) Security fixes: (res_stir_shaken) CVE-2022-26498, CVE-2022-26499 -- pjsip 2.10, security fixes: CVE-2022-21723, CVE-2022-23608, CVE-2021-37706 -- Complete Pre-Release ChangeLog: https://astlinux-project.org/beta/astlinux-changelog/ChangeLog.txt The "AstLinux Pre-Release ChangeLog" and "Pre-Release Repository URL" entries can be found under the "Development" tab of the AstLinux Project web site ... AstLinux Project -> Development https://www.astlinux-project.org/dev.html AstLinux Team |
|
From: Michael K. <li...@mk...> - 2022-04-24 14:54:22
|
Thanks for all your comments. I close this thread here, cause now I am in direct contact with the company who manufactures the analogue modems. And they offered me to debug their CallerID function with an Cisco SPA112. >> Am 20.04.2022 um 21:24 schrieb Michael Knill <mic...@ip...>: >> >> >> Ah I understand now. >> So do you know what the modem is expecting from a CLIP perspective or is this what you are trying to find? > > Exactly, this is what I am trying to find. CLIP works for me with an old analog DECT phone with 2 of the multiple variations. So the SPA112 are working in general. > >> What is the interface from the modem to the Emergency Console? Can you build something that connects directly to the console? > > No, I don‘t have access, it is a custom product from a company here in Germany, who are only producing elevation communication equipment (but it seems only analog). > >> It certainly seems like something that needs to be updated. >> >> Regards >> Michael Knill >> >> From: Michael Keuter <li...@mk...> >> Reply to: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> >> Date: Wednesday, 20 April 2022 at 9:47 pm >> To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> >> Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Analogue CLIP (CallerID) >> >> >> >> >> Am 20.04.2022 um 01:36 schrieb Michael Knill <mic...@ip...>: >> >> Hi Michael >> >> I'm a little confused here. I was assuming this: >> elevator -> PSTN -> SPA112 -> Asterisk >> >> elevator -> PSTN -> Asterisk (via Voip to PSTN)) -> SPA112 -> Modem -> Emergency Support console (special construction modem with "handset") >> >> Update: I could simulate the internal part with an 20 year old Siemens analogue DECT phone at the SPA112. >> CallerID (CLIP) works fine after the first ring with "Bellcore (bell-202 or v.23)", "ETSI FSK (bell-202 or v.23)" and "ETSI FSK with PR (UK) (bell-202 + v.23)". Even the CallerID name is shown. >> >> When I set to e.g. "DTMF Denmark" the phone shows only "External Call". >> >> >> What am I missing? >> >> Regards >> Michael Knill >> >> From: Michael Keuter <li...@mk...> >> Reply to: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> >> Date: Wednesday, 20 April 2022 at 9:20 am >> To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> >> Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Analogue CLIP (CallerID) >> >> Hi Michael, >> >> the „potential“ customer has these modems for a long time, and there are no alternatives (like SIP) at the market. >> >> And sure, in SIP I see the correct CallerID, but the modem don‘t see the „right“ CallerID generated by the ATA. >> >> Sent from a mobile device. >> >> Michael Keuter >> >> >> >> Am 20.04.2022 um 00:58 schrieb Michael Knill <mic...@ip...>: >> >> Hi Michael >> >> Just wondering why you need analogue modems to receive the calls from the elevators? >> Have you done a SIP Debug of the traffic coming from the SPA112’s to see if the number is anywhere in the SIP Invite? >> Do you know the particular standard for this in your country and is this supported by the SPA112’s? >> >> I have never used analogue FXO for anything sorry. >> >> Regards >> Michael Knill >> >> From: Michael Keuter <li...@mk...> >> Reply to: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> >> Date: Wednesday, 20 April 2022 at 2:23 am >> To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> >> Subject: [Astlinux-users] Analogue CLIP (CallerID) >> >> Hi list, >> >> I am trying to install an Asterisk PBX for an elevator emergency central in Germany. >> The callees are 6 analogue modems who receive calls from the elevators. >> >> The main issue is that the modems need to identify the elevator via a so called analogue CLIP (Calling Line Identification Presentation) where the calling number is shown to the receiving modem. >> It is not the Asterisk CALLERID(num) but a special "message" which is transfered for analogue phones between the first 2 ringings (but I think this is generated from the CALLERID(num)). >> There are several different methods for that, that can be set in the ATA (Cisco SPA112, latest EOL firmware): >> >> <image001.png><image002.png> >> >> <image003.png><image004.png> >> >> I tried every possible combination of "Caller ID Method" and "Caller ID FSK Standard", but without success. >> >> Has anybody on the list made experiences with analogue CLIP? >> >> Michael Michael http://www.mksolutions.info |
|
From: Michael K. <li...@mk...> - 2022-04-20 21:07:12
|
Sent from a mobile device. Michael Keuter > Am 20.04.2022 um 21:24 schrieb Michael Knill <mic...@ip...>: > > > Ah I understand now. > So do you know what the modem is expecting from a CLIP perspective or is this what you are trying to find? Exactly, this is what I am trying to find. CLIP works for me with an old analog DECT phone with 2 of the multiple variations. So the SPA112 are working in general. > What is the interface from the modem to the Emergency Console? Can you build something that connects directly to the console? No, I don‘t have access, it is a custom product from a company here in Germany, who are only producing elevation communication equipment (but it seems only analog). > It certainly seems like something that needs to be updated. > > Regards > Michael Knill > > From: Michael Keuter <li...@mk...> > Reply to: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> > Date: Wednesday, 20 April 2022 at 9:47 pm > To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> > Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Analogue CLIP (CallerID) > > > > > Am 20.04.2022 um 01:36 schrieb Michael Knill <mic...@ip...>: > > Hi Michael > > I'm a little confused here. I was assuming this: > elevator -> PSTN -> SPA112 -> Asterisk > > elevator -> PSTN -> Asterisk (via Voip to PSTN)) -> SPA112 -> Modem -> Emergency Support console (special construction modem with "handset") > > Update: I could simulate the internal part with an 20 year old Siemens analogue DECT phone at the SPA112. > CallerID (CLIP) works fine after the first ring with "Bellcore (bell-202 or v.23)", "ETSI FSK (bell-202 or v.23)" and "ETSI FSK with PR (UK) (bell-202 + v.23)". Even the CallerID name is shown. > > When I set to e.g. "DTMF Denmark" the phone shows only "External Call". > > > What am I missing? > > Regards > Michael Knill > > From: Michael Keuter <li...@mk...> > Reply to: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> > Date: Wednesday, 20 April 2022 at 9:20 am > To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> > Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Analogue CLIP (CallerID) > > Hi Michael, > > the „potential“ customer has these modems for a long time, and there are no alternatives (like SIP) at the market. > > And sure, in SIP I see the correct CallerID, but the modem don‘t see the „right“ CallerID generated by the ATA. > > Sent from a mobile device. > > Michael Keuter > > > > Am 20.04.2022 um 00:58 schrieb Michael Knill <mic...@ip...>: > > Hi Michael > > Just wondering why you need analogue modems to receive the calls from the elevators? > Have you done a SIP Debug of the traffic coming from the SPA112’s to see if the number is anywhere in the SIP Invite? > Do you know the particular standard for this in your country and is this supported by the SPA112’s? > > I have never used analogue FXO for anything sorry. > > Regards > Michael Knill > > From: Michael Keuter <li...@mk...> > Reply to: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> > Date: Wednesday, 20 April 2022 at 2:23 am > To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> > Subject: [Astlinux-users] Analogue CLIP (CallerID) > > Hi list, > > I am trying to install an Asterisk PBX for an elevator emergency central in Germany. > The callees are 6 analogue modems who receive calls from the elevators. > > The main issue is that the modems need to identify the elevator via a so called analogue CLIP (Calling Line Identification Presentation) where the calling number is shown to the receiving modem. > It is not the Asterisk CALLERID(num) but a special "message" which is transfered for analogue phones between the first 2 ringings (but I think this is generated from the CALLERID(num)). > There are several different methods for that, that can be set in the ATA (Cisco SPA112, latest EOL firmware): > > <image001.png><image002.png> > > <image003.png><image004.png> > > I tried every possible combination of "Caller ID Method" and "Caller ID FSK Standard", but without success. > > Has anybody on the list made experiences with analogue CLIP? > > Michael > > Michael > > http://www.mksolutions.info > > > > _______________________________________________ > Astlinux-users mailing list > Ast...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users > > Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to pa...@kr.... |
|
From: Michael K. <mic...@ip...> - 2022-04-20 19:24:02
|
Ah I understand now. So do you know what the modem is expecting from a CLIP perspective or is this what you are trying to find? What is the interface from the modem to the Emergency Console? Can you build something that connects directly to the console? It certainly seems like something that needs to be updated. Regards Michael Knill From: Michael Keuter <li...@mk...> Reply to: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> Date: Wednesday, 20 April 2022 at 9:47 pm To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Analogue CLIP (CallerID) Am 20.04.2022 um 01:36 schrieb Michael Knill <mic...@ip...<mailto:mic...@ip...>>: Hi Michael I'm a little confused here. I was assuming this: elevator -> PSTN -> SPA112 -> Asterisk elevator -> PSTN -> Asterisk (via Voip to PSTN)) -> SPA112 -> Modem -> Emergency Support console (special construction modem with "handset") Update: I could simulate the internal part with an 20 year old Siemens analogue DECT phone at the SPA112. CallerID (CLIP) works fine after the first ring with "Bellcore (bell-202 or v.23)", "ETSI FSK (bell-202 or v.23)" and "ETSI FSK with PR (UK) (bell-202 + v.23)". Even the CallerID name is shown. When I set to e.g. "DTMF Denmark" the phone shows only "External Call". What am I missing? Regards Michael Knill From: Michael Keuter <li...@mk...<mailto:li...@mk...>> Reply to: AstLinux List <ast...@li...<mailto:ast...@li...>> Date: Wednesday, 20 April 2022 at 9:20 am To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...<mailto:ast...@li...>> Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Analogue CLIP (CallerID) Hi Michael, the „potential“ customer has these modems for a long time, and there are no alternatives (like SIP) at the market. And sure, in SIP I see the correct CallerID, but the modem don‘t see the „right“ CallerID generated by the ATA. Sent from a mobile device. Michael Keuter Am 20.04.2022 um 00:58 schrieb Michael Knill <mic...@ip...<mailto:mic...@ip...>>: Hi Michael Just wondering why you need analogue modems to receive the calls from the elevators? Have you done a SIP Debug of the traffic coming from the SPA112’s to see if the number is anywhere in the SIP Invite? Do you know the particular standard for this in your country and is this supported by the SPA112’s? I have never used analogue FXO for anything sorry. Regards Michael Knill From: Michael Keuter <li...@mk...<mailto:li...@mk...>> Reply to: AstLinux List <ast...@li...<mailto:ast...@li...>> Date: Wednesday, 20 April 2022 at 2:23 am To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...<mailto:ast...@li...>> Subject: [Astlinux-users] Analogue CLIP (CallerID) Hi list, I am trying to install an Asterisk PBX for an elevator emergency central in Germany. The callees are 6 analogue modems who receive calls from the elevators. The main issue is that the modems need to identify the elevator via a so called analogue CLIP (Calling Line Identification Presentation) where the calling number is shown to the receiving modem. It is not the Asterisk CALLERID(num) but a special "message" which is transfered for analogue phones between the first 2 ringings (but I think this is generated from the CALLERID(num)). There are several different methods for that, that can be set in the ATA (Cisco SPA112, latest EOL firmware): <image001.png><image002.png> <image003.png><image004.png> I tried every possible combination of "Caller ID Method" and "Caller ID FSK Standard", but without success. Has anybody on the list made experiences with analogue CLIP? Michael Michael http://www.mksolutions.info |
|
From: David K. <da...@ke...> - 2022-04-20 15:16:42
|
Google turned up a lengthy discussion of CallerID not working on SPA112's but it is from many years ago and according to the discussion was fixed by Cisco. But it is possible that you might learn something useful from reading that thread... https://community.cisco.com/t5/atas-gateways-and-accessories/spa112-not-allowing-caller-id-to-show/td-p/1826351 David On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 7:46 AM Michael Keuter <li...@mk...> wrote: > > > Am 20.04.2022 um 01:36 schrieb Michael Knill < > mic...@ip...>: > > Hi Michael > > I'm a little confused here. I was assuming this: > elevator -> PSTN -> SPA112 -> Asterisk > > > elevator -> PSTN -> Asterisk (via Voip to PSTN)) -> SPA112 -> Modem -> > Emergency Support console (special construction modem with "handset") > > Update: I could simulate the internal part with an 20 year old Siemens > analogue DECT phone at the SPA112. > CallerID (CLIP) works fine after the first ring with "Bellcore (bell-202 > or v.23)", "ETSI FSK (bell-202 or v.23)" and "ETSI FSK with PR (UK) > (bell-202 + v.23)". Even the CallerID name is shown. > > When I set to e.g. "DTMF Denmark" the phone shows only "External Call". > > What am I missing? > > Regards > Michael Knill > > From: Michael Keuter <li...@mk...> > Reply to: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> > Date: Wednesday, 20 April 2022 at 9:20 am > To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> > Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Analogue CLIP (CallerID) > > Hi Michael, > > the „potential“ customer has these modems for a long time, and there are > no alternatives (like SIP) at the market. > > And sure, in SIP I see the correct CallerID, but the modem don‘t see the > „right“ CallerID generated by the ATA. > > Sent from a mobile device. > > Michael Keuter > > > Am 20.04.2022 um 00:58 schrieb Michael Knill < > mic...@ip...>: > > Hi Michael > > Just wondering why you need analogue modems to receive the calls from the > elevators? > Have you done a SIP Debug of the traffic coming from the SPA112’s to see > if the number is anywhere in the SIP Invite? > Do you know the particular standard for this in your country and is this > supported by the SPA112’s? > > I have never used analogue FXO for anything sorry. > > Regards > Michael Knill > > From: Michael Keuter <li...@mk...> > Reply to: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> > Date: Wednesday, 20 April 2022 at 2:23 am > To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> > Subject: [Astlinux-users] Analogue CLIP (CallerID) > > Hi list, > > I am trying to install an Asterisk PBX for an elevator emergency central > in Germany. > The callees are 6 analogue modems who receive calls from the elevators. > > The main issue is that the modems need to identify the elevator via a so > called analogue CLIP (Calling Line Identification Presentation) where the > calling number is shown to the receiving modem. > It is not the Asterisk CALLERID(num) but a special "message" which is > transfered for analogue phones between the first 2 ringings (but I think > this is generated from the CALLERID(num)). > There are several different methods for that, that can be set in the ATA > (Cisco SPA112, latest EOL firmware): > > <image001.png><image002.png> > > <image003.png><image004.png> > > I tried every possible combination of "Caller ID Method" and "Caller ID > FSK Standard", but without success. > > Has anybody on the list made experiences with analogue CLIP? > > Michael > > > Michael > > http://www.mksolutions.info > > > > _______________________________________________ > Astlinux-users mailing list > Ast...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users > > Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to > pa...@kr.... |
|
From: Michael K. <li...@mk...> - 2022-04-20 11:46:27
|
> Am 20.04.2022 um 01:36 schrieb Michael Knill <mic...@ip... <mailto:mic...@ip...>>: > > Hi Michael > > I'm a little confused here. I was assuming this: > elevator -> PSTN -> SPA112 -> Asterisk elevator -> PSTN -> Asterisk (via Voip to PSTN)) -> SPA112 -> Modem -> Emergency Support console (special construction modem with "handset") Update: I could simulate the internal part with an 20 year old Siemens analogue DECT phone at the SPA112. CallerID (CLIP) works fine after the first ring with "Bellcore (bell-202 or v.23)", "ETSI FSK (bell-202 or v.23)" and "ETSI FSK with PR (UK) (bell-202 + v.23)". Even the CallerID name is shown. When I set to e.g. "DTMF Denmark" the phone shows only "External Call". > What am I missing? > > Regards > Michael Knill > > From: Michael Keuter <li...@mk...> > Reply to: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> > Date: Wednesday, 20 April 2022 at 9:20 am > To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> > Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Analogue CLIP (CallerID) > > Hi Michael, > > the „potential“ customer has these modems for a long time, and there are no alternatives (like SIP) at the market. > > And sure, in SIP I see the correct CallerID, but the modem don‘t see the „right“ CallerID generated by the ATA. > > Sent from a mobile device. > > Michael Keuter > > >> Am 20.04.2022 um 00:58 schrieb Michael Knill <mic...@ip...>: >> >> Hi Michael >> >> Just wondering why you need analogue modems to receive the calls from the elevators? >> Have you done a SIP Debug of the traffic coming from the SPA112’s to see if the number is anywhere in the SIP Invite? >> Do you know the particular standard for this in your country and is this supported by the SPA112’s? >> >> I have never used analogue FXO for anything sorry. >> >> Regards >> Michael Knill >> >> From: Michael Keuter <li...@mk...> >> Reply to: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> >> Date: Wednesday, 20 April 2022 at 2:23 am >> To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> >> Subject: [Astlinux-users] Analogue CLIP (CallerID) >> >> Hi list, >> >> I am trying to install an Asterisk PBX for an elevator emergency central in Germany. >> The callees are 6 analogue modems who receive calls from the elevators. >> >> The main issue is that the modems need to identify the elevator via a so called analogue CLIP (Calling Line Identification Presentation) where the calling number is shown to the receiving modem. >> It is not the Asterisk CALLERID(num) but a special "message" which is transfered for analogue phones between the first 2 ringings (but I think this is generated from the CALLERID(num)). >> There are several different methods for that, that can be set in the ATA (Cisco SPA112, latest EOL firmware): >> >> <image001.png><image002.png> >> >> <image003.png><image004.png> >> >> I tried every possible combination of "Caller ID Method" and "Caller ID FSK Standard", but without success. >> >> Has anybody on the list made experiences with analogue CLIP? >> >> Michael Michael http://www.mksolutions.info |
|
From: Michael K. <mic...@ip...> - 2022-04-19 23:37:12
|
Hi Michael I'm a little confused here. I was assuming this: elevator -> PSTN -> SPA112 -> Asterisk What am I missing? Regards Michael Knill From: Michael Keuter <li...@mk...> Reply to: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> Date: Wednesday, 20 April 2022 at 9:20 am To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Analogue CLIP (CallerID) Hi Michael, the „potential“ customer has these modems for a long time, and there are no alternatives (like SIP) at the market. And sure, in SIP I see the correct CallerID, but the modem don‘t see the „right“ CallerID generated by the ATA. Sent from a mobile device. Michael Keuter Am 20.04.2022 um 00:58 schrieb Michael Knill <mic...@ip...>: Hi Michael Just wondering why you need analogue modems to receive the calls from the elevators? Have you done a SIP Debug of the traffic coming from the SPA112’s to see if the number is anywhere in the SIP Invite? Do you know the particular standard for this in your country and is this supported by the SPA112’s? I have never used analogue FXO for anything sorry. Regards Michael Knill From: Michael Keuter <li...@mk...> Reply to: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> Date: Wednesday, 20 April 2022 at 2:23 am To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> Subject: [Astlinux-users] Analogue CLIP (CallerID) Hi list, I am trying to install an Asterisk PBX for an elevator emergency central in Germany. The callees are 6 analogue modems who receive calls from the elevators. The main issue is that the modems need to identify the elevator via a so called analogue CLIP (Calling Line Identification Presentation) where the calling number is shown to the receiving modem. It is not the Asterisk CALLERID(num) but a special "message" which is transfered for analogue phones between the first 2 ringings (but I think this is generated from the CALLERID(num)). There are several different methods for that, that can be set in the ATA (Cisco SPA112, latest EOL firmware): [cid:image001.png@01D8549A.28246440][cid:image002.png@01D8549A.28246440] [cid:image003.png@01D8549A.28246440][cid:image004.png@01D8549A.28246440] I tried every possible combination of "Caller ID Method" and "Caller ID FSK Standard", but without success. Has anybody on the list made experiences with analogue CLIP? Michael http://www.mksolutions.info _______________________________________________ Astlinux-users mailing list Ast...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to pa...@kr.... |
63 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
