Re: [Asterisk-java-users] DefailtAsteriskManager.originateCall not returning the channel

[Stefan R. <sr...@re...>]

Chris Howard wrote:
> None (anymore).  I migrated to 0.3 with very little problem.  This=20
> release seems to be solid.

Thats good news.

> On a side note, why are you sticking to the=20
> 0.X numbering scheme.  I think that this should really be 1.X by now.  =


I think of the 1.0 release as being feature complete. For now the live
package still misses functionalaity with regard to Queue and Member
handling. Once this has been done I will consider a 1.0 release.
An additional issue is maintainance:
- As you have just noticed for now there is no real support for the
"stable" release, i.e. bugs are fixed in the 0.3 milestone release but
not in the "stable" 0.2.
- A "stable" release should offer backwards compatibility. There were
some very incompatible changes from 0.2 to 0.3 (with the change in the
package name being the most visible one).
In my opinion both would not be acceptable for a 1.x release.

> It may get more use if it's not thought of as "Alpha" software.

You might be right, though I notice that there is generally a very small
Java community around Asterisk and we probably won't be able to convince
any of the "script-kiddies" (with script being PHP/Perl/... ;) to switch
to Java even with the greatest Asterisk support.

=3DStefan

--=20
reuter network consulting
Neusser Str. 110
50760 Koeln
Germany
Telefon: +49 221 1305699-0
Telefax: +49 221 1305699-90
E-Mail:  sr...@re...
Jabber:  sr...@ja...