Re: [Asterisk-java-users] ManagerReader Interrupt

[Brett S. <bs...@no...>]

Stephan,

Thanks for the fix.

Is the 0.3 branch considered stable?

Regards,
Brett

King Ho wrote:
> Is there any documentation describing the changes between 0.2 and 0.3?
>
> Thanks.
>
> King
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ast...@li... [mailto:ast...@li...] On Behalf Of Stefan Reuter
> Sent: Saturday, March 04, 2006 8:33 PM
> To: ast...@li...
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-java-users] ManagerReader Interrupt
>
> Brett Sutton wrote:
>   
>> I believe a better way of dealing with this problem is to use
>> Object.wait(x) and Object.notify. For the purposes of sendAction the
>> affects are identical without the nasty side effects of calling interrupt.
>>
>> I hope this makes some sense.
>>     
>
> yes it makes a lot of sense. I followed your suggestion and it seems to
> work nicely. It also simplifies DefaultManagerConnection.
> Its in 0.3 now - if you have a chance please test the latest version
> from svn trunk:
> http://svn.reucon.net/repos/asterisk-java/trunk
>
> here is the diff:
> http://svn.reucon.net/fisheye/viewrep/repos/asterisk-java/trunk/src/main/java/org/asteriskjava/manager/DefaultManagerConnection.java?r1=40&r2=81
>
> Thanks!
>
> =Stefan
>
>