Re: [Asterisk-java-users] Possible bug in actionid generation?

[Chad K. <ch...@cm...>]

Stefan Reuter wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-04-22 at 21:59 -0500, Chad Kitching wrote:
> 
> The ResourceBundle just seemed to fit quite well
> as a default implementation for the Java platform.

I know how the correct implementation for .net should look like, but it 
would require some thinking about how to implement it properly.  I don't 
really foresee me writing AGI apps with Mono, so I don't think it'll get 
much attention.

> I think of a abstract interface on top of the Manager API that could be
> implemented in any language. My first attempt to do this is the
> AsteriskManager interface but as you see it is rudementary at least.

I can't complain.  Even if the AsteriskManager object doesn't export all 
the features that are available, the underlying objects do exceptionally 
well.  I particularily like the implementation of the event and action 
objects because I don't think it would've occured to me to use 
reflection to populate them.

> There is a guy on the asterisk-dev mailing list who wants to provide
> some kind of web services, maybe we can agree on a common interface...
> 
> Any ideas?

That would be great, although I have to admit I've never really used or 
designed any web services.  To be honest, my intended use for this would 
be for a desktop call control application, particularily for analog zap 
phones.  To that end, I require channel call tracking (which 
asterisk-java already does), channel state change notifications (which 
is not implemented, but easy to add), and extension 
transfer/originate/park/etc actions (again, easy to add).

I would be happy to help out on any such project in any way I could, though.

Chad Kitching