Re: [Asterisk-java-users] Possible bug in actionid generation?

[Stefan R. <sr...@re...>]

On Fri, 2005-04-22 at 21:59 -0500, Chad Kitching wrote:
> The fastagi code still needs work because there's no 
> direct equiv to a ResourceBundle in the CLI 

The general idea here is the MappingStrategy interface that can be
implemented in a variety of ways. Choose whatever fits the configuration
system used with .net. The ResourceBundle just seemed to fit quite well
as a default implementation for the Java platform.

> I noticed several of the objects appear to be serializable, so was 
> RMI/IIOP planned? 

Yes i am currently using it with a thin wrapper that allows connection
via JMS (Java Messaging System). There I pass Events, Actions and
Responses around so it makes sense to have them serializable.

> I believe that I will eventually need remoting in the 
> C# version (the raw manager API is too chatty, and has pretty coarse 
> security settings, so I don't really favor the simple proxies for this), 
> so I'm wondering how far I may need to diverge from the Java version's API.

I think of a abstract interface on top of the Manager API that could be
implemented in any language. My first attempt to do this is the
AsteriskManager interface but as you see it is rudementary at least.
There is a guy on the asterisk-dev mailing list who wants to provide
some kind of web services, maybe we can agree on a common interface...

Any ideas?

=Stefan